Version Polling

Yahoo Archive
1
That's great, Shirley...thanks so much. I know we'll be watching for
it as we work through our upgrading decisions. Much appreciated.

Sincerely
Judy Havlik
Plitek L.L.C.
2
Many years ago Shirley Graver did a Poll on the Vantage group to find
out how many users were on which version. The results were interesting
and informative. Has there been any thought to preparing a new, more
current Poll for the group to respond to?

Sincerely,
Judy Havlik
Plitek, L.L.C.
3
Great idea. One little tweak....seperate response options for current 8.x versions that came from 6.1 vs. "new 8.x". That is...not seperate for 8.03.4xx that came from prior 8.x version...those could be tallied as just their current version. But I would be very interested to know the % of live 8.x sites that came from 6.1 or earlier. There are a lot of new Vantage sites that did not migrate so only know 8.x (a testament to some silver tongued sales people).

So something like....
v4.0 or earlier
v5.x
v6.x
v8.0-from pre-8
v8.0
v8.03.3xx-from pre-8
c8.03.3xx
v8.03.4xx -from pre-8
v.8.03.4xx

On the 8.x patch/release/flavors lumping them into whateve xx makes sense.

-Todd C.


________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Judy Havlik
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:20 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Version Polling


Many years ago Shirley Graver did a Poll on the Vantage group to find
out how many users were on which version. The results were interesting
and informative. Has there been any thought to preparing a new, more
current Poll for the group to respond to?

Sincerely,
Judy Havlik
Plitek, L.L.C.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
Absolutely, it would be great to see this information. I'm no even
sure anymore who the site moderators are that have access to enter a
new Poll?

Sincerely,
Judy Havlik
Plitek, L.L.C.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Todd Caughey <caugheyt@...> wrote:
>
> Great idea. One little tweak....seperate response options for
current 8.x versions that came from 6.1 vs. "new 8.x". That is...not
seperate for 8.03.4xx that came from prior 8.x version...those could
be tallied as just their current version. But I would be very
interested to know the % of live 8.x sites that came from 6.1 or
earlier. There are a lot of new Vantage sites that did not migrate
so only know 8.x (a testament to some silver tongued sales people).
>
> So something like....
> v4.0 or earlier
> v5.x
> v6.x
> v8.0-from pre-8
> v8.0
> v8.03.3xx-from pre-8
> c8.03.3xx
> v8.03.4xx -from pre-8
> v.8.03.4xx
>
> On the 8.x patch/release/flavors lumping them into whateve xx makes
sense.
>
> -Todd C.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Judy Havlik
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:20 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Version Polling
>
>
> Many years ago Shirley Graver did a Poll on the Vantage group to
find
> out how many users were on which version. The results were
interesting
> and informative. Has there been any thought to preparing a new, more
> current Poll for the group to respond to?
>
> Sincerely,
> Judy Havlik
> Plitek, L.L.C.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
5
I will try to set something up to post to the group with in the next week.
But have mercy, our plant is on strike, my day is starting at 2am so I can
cover half of the graveyard shift, but I'll get something posted soon.

Shirley Graver
Moderator

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
rfc822 Compliance issue From: added by system POTENTIAL SPAM
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:47 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Version Polling



Absolutely, it would be great to see this information. I'm no even
sure anymore who the site moderators are that have access to enter a
new Poll?

Sincerely,
Judy Havlik
Plitek, L.L.C.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com, Todd
Caughey <caugheyt@...> wrote:
>
> Great idea. One little tweak....seperate response options for
current 8.x versions that came from 6.1 vs. "new 8.x". That is...not
seperate for 8.03.4xx that came from prior 8.x version...those could
be tallied as just their current version. But I would be very
interested to know the % of live 8.x sites that came from 6.1 or
earlier. There are a lot of new Vantage sites that did not migrate
so only know 8.x (a testament to some silver tongued sales people).
>
> So something like....
> v4.0 or earlier
> v5.x
> v6.x
> v8.0-from pre-8
> v8.0
> v8.03.3xx-from pre-8
> c8.03.3xx
> v8.03.4xx -from pre-8
> v.8.03.4xx
>
> On the 8.x patch/release/flavors lumping them into whateve xx makes
sense.
>
> -Todd C.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Judy Havlik
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:20 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
> Subject: [Vantage] Version Polling
>
>
> Many years ago Shirley Graver did a Poll on the Vantage group to
find
> out how many users were on which version. The results were
interesting
> and informative. Has there been any thought to preparing a new, more
> current Poll for the group to respond to?
>
> Sincerely,
> Judy Havlik
> Plitek, L.L.C.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]