Visual Scheduling 5.2?

Keith,

Yes, when I first ran it in Version 5.2 it was awful. I thought it had
locked up.
I was trying to keep pace with a Demo by Tim L. (Epicor) at our last
Northeast User Group meeting. I gave up and sat and watched for a few.
Just as he was finishing the demo mine suddenly popped up. Seeing this is
not just a problem for me, maybe Tim could enlighten us if there was some
trick to getting the performance he did for the demo. I am not in any way
sure that he did anything different, but my 800 MHz laptop could not even
compete with his for performance in the visual scheduling board.

Aaron Hoyt
Design Standards

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith . Mailloux [mailto:kmailloux@...]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:08 PM
To: 'vantage@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: [Vantage] Visual Scheduling 5.2?


Has anyone tried the Visual Scheduling Board in 5.2? If so how is the
performance? I am finding what took a second in 5.1 is now taking several
minutes. I have run all the db conversions I can and still have unusable
performance. Wanted to know if anybody else is having an issue or can try it
for me.

Thanks

Keith Mailloux
5.20.205 (Testing)


Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Has anyone tried the Visual Scheduling Board in 5.2? If so how is the
performance? I am finding what took a second in 5.1 is now taking several
minutes. I have run all the db conversions I can and still have unusable
performance. Wanted to know if anybody else is having an issue or can try it
for me.

Thanks

Keith Mailloux
5.20.205 (Testing)