I will search first. If I can't figure it out - I will ask again.
Thank you!
Thank you!
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Karen Schoenung <kschoenung@...> wrote:
>
> Search the yahoo group for dynamic query? Otherwise, possibly tomorrow, I can send an example...
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Cathy
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:05 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] What is the best way to display the Next Operation on a Job
>
>
>
> Thank you Karen,
>
> Could you point me to where I can find more information on a dynamic query?
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
> Karen Schoenung
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 11:55 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] What is the best way to display the Next Operation on
> a Job
>
> I have a combo box in MES to show the next operation and it has a filter for
> OprSeq > '?[OprSeq,"] - I expect you would need something similar on your
> whiteboard...Use a dynamic query to prompt for the current operation marked
> as complete...
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf Of cathyattechnologicsys
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:32 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] What is the best way to display the Next Operation on a
> Job
>
> We want to create a Whiteboard that displays the first not complete
> operation.
>
> We have a BAQ to get the first non complete operation but, it doesn't always
> pick the correct record. We are on version 9.05.605 and have a Progress data
> base and from the call I logged with Epicor - the first record in chooses in
> the BAQ is determine by the sysrowid not by any sort by Assembly/Operation
> sequence. Believe me we have tested this out to be true but, is fixed in a
> newer version. It doesn't happen all the time but, enough to be irritating.
>
> I would like to write a BPM and just wondering if anyone has done this
> already and could provide some direction.
>
> We don't always make sure a previous operation is complete.
>
> Any help would be appreciated since we can not use a BAQ.
>
> Thank you,
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>