407 ETA Blank Title 72026

Yahoo Archive
21
Thats a good one also. They also said they fixed the Job Entry problem where all the check boxes become unavailable.




________________________________
From: Charlie Wilson <foamdesigncsw@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 12:46:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA


Partial shipment issue seems to be fixed that is what I am after.

____________ _________ _________ _________ _
From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com] On Behalf Of
Steven Gotschall
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:53 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA

Looks like a big fix for us. According to the patch guide, they fixed the
problem in the configurator where it ignores the keep when rules when
creating a part. I'll let you know if they really did next week when I get
a chance to test it.

____________ _________ _________ __
From: clive.1972 <clive.1972@yahoo. com>
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:55:30 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA

No big bug fixes for our business there, I'll hang fire until 408 in
February 2009 I think...

--- In vantage@yahoogroups .com, Chris Thompson <chriselectrix@ ...>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Ive just been notified that .407 has been released (it was released
on 20th December).
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> CHRIS
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Chris Thompson <chriselectrix@ ...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:43:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA
>
>
> Jonathan,
>
> When you had the problem with the wiping of the Primary Bins, how
did you resolve it?
>
> Has anybody else had this problem from upgrading to 406a?
>
> We are only on 404 and Epicor are doing some customisation for us
but we need to be on 407 - That'll be fun by the sounds of things!
>
> Cheers,
>
> CHRIS
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Jonathan Lang <lsbestinc@yahoo. com>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:29:03 PM
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA
>
> Mark,
> Â
> Notice the 9.."x". I'll wait for a later version of the kernel
before upgrading. Everytime upgrades come out that fixes a problem I
have, I cringe wondering what chaos the patch will unleash on my DB.
> Â
> I did upgrade to 406A because it fixed a HUGE problem with Job
Closing. After the upgrade was finished I noticed that all of the
Primary Bins had been erased from many parts, not all. When I ran a
report to see how many parts had no Primary Bin it counted 19,056
parts.
> Â
> There were many other "little" problems I had to fix, but you are
left with a queezy feeling after the upgrade has been accomplished.
> Jonathan LangÂ
> Oil Rite Corporation
> Sr. Network Administrator
> Ph: (920) 682-6173 Ext: 126
> Fax: (920) 682-7699
> jlang@oilrite. com
>
> --- On Wed, 12/17/08, Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@ yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From: Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@ yahoo.com>
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA
> To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 9:53 AM
>
> >
> > Every release brings that many more problems. I'll wait for 9.x.
> >
>
> Oh, Dude....
>
> Mark "with open issues on 9" W.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
22
We got One Off for that problem and a very similar one in quote entry.

________________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Gotschall
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 1:46 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA

Thats a good one also. They also said they fixed the Job Entry problem
where all the check boxes become unavailable.

________________________________
From: Charlie Wilson <foamdesigncsw@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 12:46:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA

Partial shipment issue seems to be fixed that is what I am after.

____________ _________ _________ _________ _
From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com] On Behalf
Of
Steven Gotschall
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:53 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA

Looks like a big fix for us. According to the patch guide, they fixed the
problem in the configurator where it ignores the keep when rules when
creating a part. I'll let you know if they really did next week when I get
a chance to test it.

____________ _________ _________ __
From: clive.1972 <clive.1972@yahoo. com>
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:55:30 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA

No big bug fixes for our business there, I'll hang fire until 408 in
February 2009 I think...

--- In vantage@yahoogroups .com, Chris Thompson <chriselectrix@ ...>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Ive just been notified that .407 has been released (it was released
on 20th December).
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> CHRIS
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Chris Thompson <chriselectrix@ ...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:43:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA
>
>
> Jonathan,
>
> When you had the problem with the wiping of the Primary Bins, how
did you resolve it?
>
> Has anybody else had this problem from upgrading to 406a?
>
> We are only on 404 and Epicor are doing some customisation for us
but we need to be on 407 - That'll be fun by the sounds of things!
>
> Cheers,
>
> CHRIS
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Jonathan Lang <lsbestinc@yahoo. com>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:29:03 PM
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA
>
> Mark,
> Â
> Notice the 9.."x". I'll wait for a later version of the kernel
before upgrading. Everytime upgrades come out that fixes a problem I
have, I cringe wondering what chaos the patch will unleash on my DB.
> Â
> I did upgrade to 406A because it fixed a HUGE problem with Job
Closing. After the upgrade was finished I noticed that all of the
Primary Bins had been erased from many parts, not all. When I ran a
report to see how many parts had no Primary Bin it counted 19,056
parts.
> Â
> There were many other "little" problems I had to fix, but you are
left with a queezy feeling after the upgrade has been accomplished.
> Jonathan LangÂ
> Oil Rite Corporation
> Sr. Network Administrator
> Ph: (920) 682-6173 Ext: 126
> Fax: (920) 682-7699
> jlang@oilrite. com
>
> --- On Wed, 12/17/08, Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@ yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From: Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@ yahoo.com>
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA
> To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 9:53 AM
>
> >
> > Every release brings that many more problems. I'll wait for 9.x.
> >
>
> Oh, Dude....
>
> Mark "with open issues on 9" W.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
23
What is the global scheduling bug you are referring to here? We have just started using at and have a few issues.
Thanks
 Melissa Hietala
UMC, Inc.
melissah@...




________________________________
From: Robert Brown <robertb_versa@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:20:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA


Vic,

Clive is right (in our experience). 404 was an abomination (re bugs). 405(a) is much better (although still one HUGE bug with global scheduling - that 406 doesn't fix as we've tested).

I'd consider 405. If you're customized, the only area we found it broke customizations (404 to 405) was with PO Entry. Most of our customization in PO Entry to were self-fix bugs and they actually fixed many of the bugs (and cclearly made some major under the hood changes) so our 404 PO Entry customizations broke.

Other than that, the only thing close to being an OK (quality) release I've seen out of Epicor.

We don't feel compelled to blindly upgrade either. (More trouble than it's worth with Epicor's horrific release quality track record.)

I'm with you... I'll wait for v10 before seriously considering v9 & let others more daring do Epicor's QC for them. ....They should pay US! :)

We're in business to serve our customers & try to eke out a profit - Not just blindly play with the latest/greatest claimed Epicor offering & devote hundreds of hours to doing there QC for them.

Rob

--- On Thu, 12/18/08, clive.1972 <clive.1972@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: clive.1972 <clive.1972@yahoo. com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 407 ETA
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 3:21 AM

Vic,

I can remember at least three big bugs that were fixed in 405, you may

want to check the change list for 405 to see what bugs you're still

running with.

There's one fixed that can effect costs on materials issued to jobs and

another that sorts out a problem with change logs.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups .com, "Vic Drecchio" <vic.drecchio@ ...> wrote:

>

> I'm on 404B and staying. Why? It works.

>

> I've NEVER been a big fan of upgrading "just because" someone decides

to release a service pack.

>

> To this day I disable Windows Update on everything I own.

>

> "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

>

> I learn the nuances and work-arounds on my version and stick with

it. Because every time an "upgrade" or "patch" is applied, 10 other

unknown new problems are revealed.

>

> I'm with Jonathan.... .. but I'll wait for Vantage 10. :-)

>
















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]