We have found the apparent source of the problem. We made a change to the production calendars in prep for getting scheduling going. The day we made that change is the day we started having this issue. We set all of the calendars to 24 hrs and the issue stopped. Still not sure what's going on in detail but we've found a place to start.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "cmulford_66" <cmulford_66@...> wrote:
>
> Check the MOM and/or production standards for the Job with issues. I've run across this when the production standard is VERY high. Usually it's been engineered incorrectly with hours per piece instead up fixed hrs. The job then tries to calc a 20,000 piece job that's supposed to take a 2 hour fixed but instead calcs 40,000 hours for the op. If this happens the bi will run away when ending the activity in MES or doing some scheduling. Have you noticed any issues with MES when ending activty?
>
> I have a dashboard that we run daily to watch for jobs with ops of over a 1000 production or setup hours.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "vantagenook" <jmcloughlin@> wrote:
> >
> > Anybody have additional insight into this? We are having the same problem starting last week. Our DB is about 5GB but our bi file is growing from 0 to 20GB during the course of 2 shifts. I'm having to get up in the middle of the night and back it up and truncate the bi just to keep running the next day. System gets practically unusable later in the day.
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Brian Johnson <bjohnson@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Probably a circular reference. Part->Material->Part. Maybe in multiple levels
> > > Assembly1->SubAssembly2->SubAssembly3->Assembly1.
> > >
> > > Brian Johnson -- Epi-Center <http://epi-ctr.com>
> > > Director of Technical Services | direct: 413-531-2859
> > >
> > > On 10/26/2010 01:16 PM, ppipaulz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We've found the source of the growth, when a user in the Job Entry screen goes to the Get Job
> > > > Details screen and selects a particular job, that's when the growth starts and stops only when the
> > > > database is shut down (which isn't easy since that user's session doesn't want to terminate by the
> > > > normal shut down process). I confirmed the steps in the test database with the same result with
> > > > only my user present.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the replies, info and suggestions.
> > > >
> > > > I think I'm pretty lucky that the user reported the issue, this could have been ahuge nightmare.
> > > > Next steps are to figure out why this is happening with this particular job, and somehow prevent it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>