Under manifest info is a place for third party billing. The way we set
up our shipto under the customer maintenance screen there is a place for
billing maintained by billing code. Depending on your billing choice in
the customer shipment entry form this will flow that data automatically
to fill out those fields in the shpdtl. Sounds like you have a pretty
interesting solution never the less.
Rob Bucek
Manufacturing Engineer
PH: 715-284-5376 ext 311
FAX: 715-284-4084
<
http://www.dsmfg.com/>
(Click the logo to view our site)
________________________________
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Lynn
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:14 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Bill Of Lading Module
We needed a place to put the name & address for 3rd party billing.
The Carrier field on the BOL screen was not linked to any other table.
The user needed to type a carrier name even if it was the same as the
Ship Via which already existed on the Sales Orders and the packing
lists. We wanted to be able to use our Ship Via codes, so I hid the
Carrier field & linked the Ship Via codes to the BOL.
I added a lookup box control for Frieght choices (PPD, COL, COD, 3rd
party prepaid, & 3rd party collect).
And because some of our shipping is sometimes done from a centralized
location, we also had a need for a different sender address to appear on
the BOL than on the Packing List. I added a lookup box to populate the
desired Company name & address that needed to appear on the BOL hardcopy
form.
Finally, on the BOL Lines tab, I added fields for cubage and density and
calculator buttons. Usage of these fields is not mandatory.
All of the fields that I added to the maintenance screen were requested
by users to be on the Crystal Report BOL form.
Then I added all the Linked Packing Slip numbers to the CR BOL Form.
I may have been able to pull some of this stuff into the CR from the
ShipDtl as you did. However, since different people in different
locations may be preparing Packing Slips and then someone different may
be pulling multiple packing slips on the same BOL, to put these fields
on the BOL maintenance screens offered the shipper who is responsible
for loading the truck more flexibility & control.
Lynn
--- In
vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rob
Bucek" <rbucek@...> wrote:
>
> You've got my curiosity going about the controls you added to the form
> itself...what was missing for your particular business needs? By the
> BOL CR Form do you mean the crystal report? I do remember having to
> modify the data definition so it would bring in information from the
> shipdtl table but beyond modifying that (which was easy) the real time
> was spent building the BOL itself in crystal (that did take hours).
> Beyond that all the information we needed flowed very well.
>
>
>
> Rob Bucek
>
> Manufacturing Engineer
>
> PH: 715-284-5376 ext 311
>
> FAX: 715-284-4084
>
> <http://www.dsmfg.com/ <http://www.dsmfg.com/> >
>
> (Click the logo to view our site)
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
> Of Lynn
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 2:13 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Bill Of Lading Module
>
>
>
> I agree with you. It does appear that about 1 hour was spent writing
the
> BOL module in 8.
>
> We also found it pretty useless. So, we very heavily customized the
> maintenance screens. I added dozens of controls to the BOL maintenance
> using UD fields.
>
> After adding those UD fields, then I copied the Epicor-provided BOL CR
> form. I added dozens of fields to the CR form in order to make it into
> something actually usable.
>
> Lynn
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "brad.ebright" <bebright@> wrote:
> >
> > Does anybody use the BOL in vantage 8? There are some people in my
> company that want to get rid of the external BOL program we use and
use
> the one with vantage. To me, it looks pretty useless. You can link
> packing slips, but it doesnt pull in any information. The report that
> prints out is lousy. It looks like epicor said "Oh crap, we need a BOL
> program", and made it in an hour and then released vantage.
> >
> > Does anybody have some insight into this or a report that they made
> that they would be willing to share with me...
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Brad
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]