Configurator (or other) to handle mid-production changes?

Yahoo Archive
1
It depends on several things in your configured item, but if you have a change to a configured item and the Method changes, when you right click on the configured job assembly and choose get details you will get a dialog box with append changes on it, asking you whether you want to include the appended changes. You might try that to see if that helps in your situation



________________________________
From: cubcrafters_it <jason.navarrete@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 12:13 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Configurator (or other) to handle mid-production changes?


Â
It's not uncommon for us to have to deal with some sort of configuration change while our product is being built.

Is there something built-in to Epicor 9 that will identify the specific part/assembly changes that will be required due to a mid-stream configuration change? Will the Configurator do it (we're not using it currently...)?




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
It's not uncommon for us to have to deal with some sort of configuration change while our product is being built.

Is there something built-in to Epicor 9 that will identify the specific part/assembly changes that will be required due to a mid-stream configuration change? Will the Configurator do it (we're not using it currently...)?
3
Are talking about revising methods after a job had already been created?
If so, I think you'll be stuck making the revisions manually.

I know one user who had explored a customization for this with Epicor but they never followed thru with that project.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "cubcrafters_it" <jason.navarrete@...> wrote:
>
> It's not uncommon for us to have to deal with some sort of configuration change while our product is being built.
>
> Is there something built-in to Epicor 9 that will identify the specific part/assembly changes that will be required due to a mid-stream configuration change? Will the Configurator do it (we're not using it currently...)?
>