E904.507A - more than one roo table detected

They will send you a fix that has to be done on every computer that runs BAQs. If they don’t, let me know and I’ll track the one down that they sent me.



Beth Rye

IT Director

CIGNYS
Email: <mailto:brye@...> brye@...



***ITAR NOTICE***

This e-mail and/or the attached documents may contain technical data within the definition of the International Traffic in Arms regulations, and are subject to the export control laws of the US Government. Transfer of this data by any means to a foreign person, whether in the US or abroad, without an export license or other approval from the US Department of State, is prohibited. No portion of this e-mail or its attachment(s) may be reproduced without written consent of CIGNYS. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this document in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail and any attachments immediately.



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Wagner
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 10:47 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: E904.507A - more than one roo table detected





Thanks, I'll give them a call again and let support know there is already an SCR out there

From: Elizabeth <gracefulthreads@... <mailto:gracefulthreads%40yahoo.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 10:32 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: E904.507A - more than one roo table detected


That is also a bug in 507A (I just ran into it over the weekend when we upgraded). Call Epicor support and ask about SCR 78693.

Ernie Lowell
Diba Industries

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Jose Gomez <jose@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> That happens sometimes, I've always just had to start over with the query
> when it gets pesky like that.
>
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > I have a UD Table linked to the serial table. When I try to a add another
> > table, in this case "customer", the relationship between Serial And Customer
> > tables inherits the existing relationships already established between UD01
> > and Serial. When I try to run the query I receive the "more than one root
> > table established"
> >
> > Has anyone else seen this when using UD tables in BAQs?
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I have a UD Table linked to the serial table. When I try to a add another table, in this case "customer", the relationship between Serial And Customer tables inherits the existing relationships already established between UD01 and Serial. When I try to run the query I receive the "more than one root table established"
Â
Has anyone else seen this when using UD tables in BAQs?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi Mark,

That happens sometimes, I've always just had to start over with the query
when it gets pesky like that.


*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> I have a UD Table linked to the serial table. When I try to a add another
> table, in this case "customer", the relationship between Serial And Customer
> tables inherits the existing relationships already established between UD01
> and Serial. When I try to run the query I receive the "more than one root
> table established"
>
> Has anyone else seen this when using UD tables in BAQs?
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
That is also a bug in 507A (I just ran into it over the weekend when we upgraded). Call Epicor support and ask about SCR 78693.

Ernie Lowell
Diba Industries

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Jose Gomez <jose@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> That happens sometimes, I've always just had to start over with the query
> when it gets pesky like that.
>
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > I have a UD Table linked to the serial table. When I try to a add another
> > table, in this case "customer", the relationship between Serial And Customer
> > tables inherits the existing relationships already established between UD01
> > and Serial. When I try to run the query I receive the "more than one root
> > table established"
> >
> > Has anyone else seen this when using UD tables in BAQs?
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Thanks, I'll give them a call again and let support know there is already an SCR out there


From: Elizabeth <gracefulthreads@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 10:32 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: E904.507A - more than one roo table detected


Â
That is also a bug in 507A (I just ran into it over the weekend when we upgraded). Call Epicor support and ask about SCR 78693.

Ernie Lowell
Diba Industries

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Jose Gomez <jose@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> That happens sometimes, I've always just had to start over with the query
> when it gets pesky like that.
>
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > I have a UD Table linked to the serial table. When I try to a add another
> > table, in this case "customer", the relationship between Serial And Customer
> > tables inherits the existing relationships already established between UD01
> > and Serial. When I try to run the query I receive the "more than one root
> > table established"
> >
> > Has anyone else seen this when using UD tables in BAQs?
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]