One thing that I noticed on the Red Dots is that if your Current
Inventory for a particular Stocked Material is less than the job
requirements, it'll be flagged as Red.
This is quite contrary to what we normally practice in our business,
as we'd like to keep stock levels minimum and we issues materials a
few times across the lifespan of the job.
In most of our cases we keep 2 week's worth of supply (100) for a job
that runs 3 to 4 months (600). And we replenish/PO and issues on a
weekly/bi weekly basis as the job goes along. Based on this, the Job
will have a Red Dot all across its lifespan until the final week of
material issues. Where our quantity on hand will actually exceeds what
the job needs.
I were expecting it to look into the Time Phase and the projected
materials delivery to mark a material as critical(red) or not. Seems
like it doesnt do that, but instead only looks at the Quantity On Hand.
Regards.
Inventory for a particular Stocked Material is less than the job
requirements, it'll be flagged as Red.
This is quite contrary to what we normally practice in our business,
as we'd like to keep stock levels minimum and we issues materials a
few times across the lifespan of the job.
In most of our cases we keep 2 week's worth of supply (100) for a job
that runs 3 to 4 months (600). And we replenish/PO and issues on a
weekly/bi weekly basis as the job goes along. Based on this, the Job
will have a Red Dot all across its lifespan until the final week of
material issues. Where our quantity on hand will actually exceeds what
the job needs.
I were expecting it to look into the Time Phase and the projected
materials delivery to mark a material as critical(red) or not. Seems
like it doesnt do that, but instead only looks at the Quantity On Hand.
Regards.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Robert Brown <robertb_versa@...> wrote:
>
> Yup... That covers it.
>
> All of those things are better communicated via Buyers workbench or
Planning workbench in an MRP environment.
>
> Your observation of the false red dot coming from a part that may
have had a receipt backed out and redone is interesting as it 'rings
true' with what I remember of what I referred to in the prior email as
a remaining rare bug.
>
> I think inspection failures (with eventual DMR acceptance) and
reverse ISSUES to jobs may also 'confuse' the logic.
>
> Rob
>