I’ll agree with @Mark_Wonsil too. I see no reason to have an FOB field when a single incoterms field would suffice. The only thing I can think of is the FOB field really is there to contain the subset of FOB designations we ten to use domestically to indicate the transfer of ownership as well. Like the last company I was with used two codes (primarily) called ‘FOB-Destination’ and ‘FOB-Mill’ indicating that the customer was ‘taking ownership’ at either their location or our mfg site. Even if that is the case, a single Incoterms field could contain those (and any other) variation of existing ICC codes to include change of ownership suffixes.
1 Like