Miguel,
I tried testing your BAQ phrase setup below but when I went to not allow
a plant in the user security setting, then that plant was also no longer
available in the Dashboard to view or select in the tracker. Seems like
your phrase builder still uses standard Epicor plant security access. I
am pulling in the Warehse.Plant, Warehse.WarehouseCode, and
Warehse.Description fields.
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Miguel Santillan
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 4:30 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
Perhaps,
for each PartBin no-lock , each Part no-lock where (PartBin.Company =
Part.Company and PartBin.PartNum = Part.PartNum ) , each Warehse no-lock
where (PartBin.Company = Warehse.Company and PartBin.WarehouseCode =
Warehse.WarehouseCode ).
PartBin
Whse (Plant)
Part
Part Bin still gives you your Onhand...but I am not sure what fields you
are using in the PartWhse to display.
This is still a different BAQ though.
Miguel A. Santillan
Compass Components, Inc.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Chang, Chia
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 1:44 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
Without making any changes to the current BAQ and the Warehse table
link, is there any other way to allow standard Epicor security for plant
access to allow viewing multi-plant data in a dashboard but not give the
user access to other plant's menu items?
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Arul Shankar
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 3:33 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
Don't link the Warehse table. Once you link any table which has Plant
field in it then it will go through standard Epicor security for plant
access.
Regards,
Arul
________________________________
From: "Chang, Chia" cchang@... <mailto:cchang%40apog.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013 8:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
The BAQ has the Warehouse table linked to the PartBin table which is
then linked to the Part table. We want to be able to pull in data from
the Warehse.WarehouseCode and Warehse.Plant field.
________________________________
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Arul Shankar
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 2:54 PM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
PartBin table which stores Qty on Hand bypasses plant security since it
doesn't store plant value. By using PartBin table, write a BAQ and
display the QOH from multi-plant. If you can identify the plant id from
warehouse code, then add that as a formula in the BAQ so that plant id
can be displayed.
Regards,
Arul
________________________________
From: "Chang, Chia" mailto:cchang%40apog.com >
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013 5:42 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
The query is pulling in multiple warehouses that are in multiple plants.
There is not a current plant criteria that I can see that could be
affecting this. Are warehouses in different plants affected by user
security access too?
________________________________
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Miguel Santillan
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 10:28 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
You can create the query so that it is not based on Cur-Plant.
Essentially don't make Cur-Plant a criteria.
The out of the box trackers for inventory are plant restricted.
So Yes.
Miguel A. Santillan
Compass Components, Inc.
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com ] On
Behalf Of Chang, Chia
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 7:21 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
Does anyone know if it is possible to allow a user access to view
multi-plant part on hand qty in a dashboard but not allow them access to
multi-plant menu items? If we allow the user access to multi-plant in
their user security settings, it also allows them to possibly make
transactions in another plant which we do not want. Is there a way to
allow a user multi-plant access in a dashboard but not multi-plant main
menu or is this a limitation with multi-plant user security access?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I tried testing your BAQ phrase setup below but when I went to not allow
a plant in the user security setting, then that plant was also no longer
available in the Dashboard to view or select in the tracker. Seems like
your phrase builder still uses standard Epicor plant security access. I
am pulling in the Warehse.Plant, Warehse.WarehouseCode, and
Warehse.Description fields.
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Miguel Santillan
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 4:30 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
Perhaps,
for each PartBin no-lock , each Part no-lock where (PartBin.Company =
Part.Company and PartBin.PartNum = Part.PartNum ) , each Warehse no-lock
where (PartBin.Company = Warehse.Company and PartBin.WarehouseCode =
Warehse.WarehouseCode ).
PartBin
Whse (Plant)
Part
Part Bin still gives you your Onhand...but I am not sure what fields you
are using in the PartWhse to display.
This is still a different BAQ though.
Miguel A. Santillan
Compass Components, Inc.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Chang, Chia
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 1:44 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
Without making any changes to the current BAQ and the Warehse table
link, is there any other way to allow standard Epicor security for plant
access to allow viewing multi-plant data in a dashboard but not give the
user access to other plant's menu items?
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Arul Shankar
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 3:33 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
Don't link the Warehse table. Once you link any table which has Plant
field in it then it will go through standard Epicor security for plant
access.
Regards,
Arul
________________________________
From: "Chang, Chia" cchang@... <mailto:cchang%40apog.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013 8:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
The BAQ has the Warehouse table linked to the PartBin table which is
then linked to the Part table. We want to be able to pull in data from
the Warehse.WarehouseCode and Warehse.Plant field.
________________________________
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Arul Shankar
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 2:54 PM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
PartBin table which stores Qty on Hand bypasses plant security since it
doesn't store plant value. By using PartBin table, write a BAQ and
display the QOH from multi-plant. If you can identify the plant id from
warehouse code, then add that as a formula in the BAQ so that plant id
can be displayed.
Regards,
Arul
________________________________
From: "Chang, Chia" mailto:cchang%40apog.com >
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013 5:42 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
The query is pulling in multiple warehouses that are in multiple plants.
There is not a current plant criteria that I can see that could be
affecting this. Are warehouses in different plants affected by user
security access too?
________________________________
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Miguel Santillan
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 10:28 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
You can create the query so that it is not based on Cur-Plant.
Essentially don't make Cur-Plant a criteria.
The out of the box trackers for inventory are plant restricted.
So Yes.
Miguel A. Santillan
Compass Components, Inc.
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com ] On
Behalf Of Chang, Chia
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 7:21 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Multi-plant user security
Does anyone know if it is possible to allow a user access to view
multi-plant part on hand qty in a dashboard but not allow them access to
multi-plant menu items? If we allow the user access to multi-plant in
their user security settings, it also allows them to possibly make
transactions in another plant which we do not want. Is there a way to
allow a user multi-plant access in a dashboard but not multi-plant main
menu or is this a limitation with multi-plant user security access?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]