Interesting thoughts for a sort of reverse situation I have at home. Yes, we have a domain at work by the way. I want to set one up at home too because I want to get rid of my wife's lame Win7 Home that won't let me disable the #$&%*&^ UAC because Home does not have group policy editor. That alone is worth paying for the difference from the Home version....domain or not. But as long as I will have Pro on the home machines and have a server I might as well make a domain.
-Todd C.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ari Footlik
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 5:28 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: [OT] Remote PC Access desk to desk
Ned, you're probably right - they're probably in a domain situation,
considering they have the money to spend on Vantage.
While it may not apply in this particular case, small offices are often
set up as "workgroups" for any number of reasons, and the $99 (?)
difference between Home and Pro, multiplied by the number of computers
in the office, can be an attractive way to effect some cost savings. In
my consulting days, I had a lot of projects making "workgroup" machines
function as seamlessly as "domain" machines - not fun, but in an office
with no permanent IT staff, an old PC acting as a file-server, and few
client machines, it's not terrible...
--A
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf
Of Ned
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:18 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: [OT] Remote PC Access desk to desk
I wouldn't think or expect that any PC in an office would have XP Home
on
it, especially since Home doesn't have the capability to connect to a
domain
which is what it sounds like he is doing. So unless her PC is still
windows
2000, it shouldn't be an issue.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-Todd C.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ari Footlik
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 5:28 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: [OT] Remote PC Access desk to desk
Ned, you're probably right - they're probably in a domain situation,
considering they have the money to spend on Vantage.
While it may not apply in this particular case, small offices are often
set up as "workgroups" for any number of reasons, and the $99 (?)
difference between Home and Pro, multiplied by the number of computers
in the office, can be an attractive way to effect some cost savings. In
my consulting days, I had a lot of projects making "workgroup" machines
function as seamlessly as "domain" machines - not fun, but in an office
with no permanent IT staff, an old PC acting as a file-server, and few
client machines, it's not terrible...
--A
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf
Of Ned
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:18 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: [OT] Remote PC Access desk to desk
I wouldn't think or expect that any PC in an office would have XP Home
on
it, especially since Home doesn't have the capability to connect to a
domain
which is what it sounds like he is doing. So unless her PC is still
windows
2000, it shouldn't be an issue.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]