Parts not needed on the buyers workbench

Yahoo Archive
1
If the line item on the PO was manually linked to the Job (via PO
Entry), I have seen where the PO Suggestions will hold onto the
suggestion until the Job Completes.
Thanks
Patty

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Jessi Utecht <jessi.utecht@...> wrote:
>
> We have a part that is showing up on the buyers workbench that has
been received and issued to a job. This part is no longer needed. What
could be causing demand to be showing for this? We run the conversion
6430 every sunday and this does not remove this from the buyers
workbench. The part is a subcontract part on the fly. Any other ideas?
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
2
We have a part that is showing up on the buyers workbench that has been received and issued to a job. This part is no longer needed. What could be causing demand to be showing for this? We run the conversion 6430 every sunday and this does not remove this from the buyers workbench. The part is a subcontract part on the fly. Any other ideas?




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
The job has not been received complete? The job calls for 50 and only 49
received. On the last receipt, the job received complete was not checked
leaving a demand for the subcontract work.



Charlie Smith

Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC

www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
www.2WTech.com









From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jessi Utecht
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:12 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Parts not needed on the buyers workbench



We have a part that is showing up on the buyers workbench that has been
received and issued to a job. This part is no longer needed. What could
be causing demand to be showing for this? We run the conversion 6430
every sunday and this does not remove this from the buyers workbench.
The part is a subcontract part on the fly. Any other ideas?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]