Pending Inspection effecting the GL E9 702A

Yahoo Archive
1
Thanks for your help, I think that is our issue.

-Phil

Phil Collier | ERP Administrator
[Description: Description: cid:image002.jpg@01CCD052.4A33DBB0]
Dynomax Inc. | Design * Manufacturing * Performance
1535 Abbott Drive, Wheeling, IL 60090| www.dynomaxinc.com<http://www.dynomaxinc.com/>
Main: 847.680.8833 | Direct: 224.207.7657 | Fax: : 847.680.8838


________________________________

This electronic message transmission is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is addressed, including any attachments, and contains information from Dynomax Inc, which may be privileged, competition sensitive, confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

ITAR Notice: This email may contain technical data which may be controlled by the US International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR) 22 CFT part 120-130. If this data is determined to be ITAR controlled, such data may not be transmitted, shared or provided to any foreign party or entity either verbally or visually without proper licenses from the State Department. It is your responsibility to assure this item can by legally shared with another party. Thank you for your compliance.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2

I am wondering if anyone knows how pending inspections effect the GL. Accounting came to me today asking for a list of users that have access to the GL general operations, because they have been finding changes to the GL after the period is closed. The changes are hitting the inventory and materials accounts. Its been a while since I have worked in quality but I do remember the Controller at my previous employer asking me to process pending inspections prior to the month being closed. any ideas would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

-Phil

3
Inspections hit the Inspections account under the COS/WIP GL control. When put into the inspection queue –WIP/+GL Acct. When removed from inspection –GL acct/+Destination Acct (Inventory, DMR, etc).
If the GL Apply Date is current for the inventory module, there should be no backdating of the G/L transactions when captured.

Charlie Smith
ESSNER Manufacturing, L.P.
6651 Will Rogers Blvd.
Fort Worth, TX 76140
csmith@...<mailto:csmith@...>
ph: (817) 529-6165
fx: (817) 568-2625
[LOGO_Essner_Manufacturing]

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 12:40 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Pending Inspection effecting the GL E9 702A



I am wondering if anyone knows how pending inspections effect the GL. Accounting came to me today asking for a list of users that have access to the GL general operations, because they have been finding changes to the GL after the period is closed. The changes are hitting the inventory and materials accounts. Its been a while since I have worked in quality but I do remember the Controller at my previous employer asking me to process pending inspections prior to the month being closed. any ideas would be appreciated.



Thanks

-Phil



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4

The changes are also hitting AP. When you mention GL
Apply Date is current is this the “Use current date when matching GL
transactions” check box  under General
Ledger in the Company Configuration?

5
No Earliest Apply Date. Check to make sure the Inventory Earliest Apply date is current.

Charlie Smith
ESSNER Manufacturing, L.P.
6651 Will Rogers Blvd.
Fort Worth, TX 76140
csmith@...<mailto:csmith@...>
ph: (817) 529-6165
fx: (817) 568-2625
[LOGO_Essner_Manufacturing]

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 1:04 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Pending Inspection effecting the GL E9 702A


The changes are also hitting AP. When you mention GL Apply Date is current is this the “Use current date when matching GL transactions” check box under General Ledger in the Company Configuration?



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
6
Ok I looked and the only date in the Earliest Apply Date Entry is a date for the company that looks like it is from our go live period. There is nothing for the Per Module / Transaction Type setup. If I understand correctly since the company date is not current and we have nothing setup on the Module, if a part was received in June and inspected today it would hit the GL for June not March?

Phil Collier | ERP Administrator
[Description: Description: cid:image002.jpg@01CCD052.4A33DBB0]
Dynomax Inc. | Design * Manufacturing * Performance
1535 Abbott Drive, Wheeling, IL 60090| www.dynomaxinc.com<http://www.dynomaxinc.com/>
Main: 847.680.8833 | Direct: 224.207.7657 | Fax: : 847.680.8838


________________________________

This electronic message transmission is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is addressed, including any attachments, and contains information from Dynomax Inc, which may be privileged, competition sensitive, confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

ITAR Notice: This email may contain technical data which may be controlled by the US International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR) 22 CFT part 120-130. If this data is determined to be ITAR controlled, such data may not be transmitted, shared or provided to any foreign party or entity either verbally or visually without proper licenses from the State Department. It is your responsibility to assure this item can by legally shared with another party. Thank you for your compliance.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
7
The receipt would hit June (I am assuming 2014) but the inspection would hit April (Inspected Today). Unless the Earliest Apply Date was 03/01. In that case when the capture was done, and assuming the outdated transactions were rolled to the month of capture, the the receipt would hit March and the Inspection would hit April.

Double check using your INV-WIP Reconciliation report. After each capture run it for any un-posted transactions (starting at 01/01/01 through the end of the posting period) and verify that everything got posted.

Charlie Smith
ESSNER Manufacturing, L.P.
6651 Will Rogers Blvd.
Fort Worth, TX 76140
csmith@...<mailto:csmith@...>
ph: (817) 529-6165
fx: (817) 568-2625
[LOGO_Essner_Manufacturing]

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 2:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Pending Inspection effecting the GL E9 702A



Ok I looked and the only date in the Earliest Apply Date Entry is a date for the company that looks like it is from our go live period. There is nothing for the Per Module / Transaction Type setup. If I understand correctly since the company date is not current and we have nothing setup on the Module, if a part was received in June and inspected today it would hit the GL for June not March?

Phil Collier | ERP Administrator
[Description: Description: cid:image002.jpg@01CCD052.4A33DBB0]
Dynomax Inc. | Design * Manufacturing * Performance
1535 Abbott Drive, Wheeling, IL 60090| www.dynomaxinc.com<http://www.dynomaxinc.com/<http://www.dynomaxinc.com%3chttp:/www.dynomaxinc.com/>>
Main: 847.680.8833 | Direct: 224.207.7657 | Fax: : 847.680.8838

________________________________

This electronic message transmission is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is addressed, including any attachments, and contains information from Dynomax Inc, which may be privileged, competition sensitive, confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

ITAR Notice: This email may contain technical data which may be controlled by the US International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR) 22 CFT part 120-130. If this data is determined to be ITAR controlled, such data may not be transmitted, shared or provided to any foreign party or entity either verbally or visually without proper licenses from the State Department. It is your responsibility to assure this item can by legally shared with another party. Thank you for your compliance.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]