Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

There is always a chance for a Perpetual/GL disconnect when changes are made to Purchased Receipts from a prior accounting period. The bookings are generated based upon the original receipt date and not the day you are making the changes. The good news is that Vantage will bring these back-dated bookings to your attention when you run the "Capture COS/WIP Activity" process, they will be flagged as date errors. You are free to change the dates or ignore them and suffer the consequences. Anyway, this could be a possibility. We are on Vantage 8.03.403D.

Peter Dunbar
Halm Industries Co., Inc.
How do you balance your perpetual inventory to the G/L at month end? Which reports/data do you use to do this?

We can get our non-conforming warehouses to balance, but our raw materials and finished goods warehouses just won't play nice. Any insight would be appreciated.

Thanks, Kirstin
I am in the same boat. However, although I do plan to get to the bottom of this someday, my differences have not yet been so large that I can't just write-off the difference. One tip - You need to run the inventory reports that you are balancing to (stock status and work in process) exactly at month end. Even though you can select dates for these reports, the balances seem to be unreliable if run at another time. If I run an inventory detail listing right now for September 30, the details will be different than the report I ran first thing in the morning on October 1.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electricmirror.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kirstin
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:03 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L



How do you balance your perpetual inventory to the G/L at month end? Which reports/data do you use to do this?

We can get our non-conforming warehouses to balance, but our raw materials and finished goods warehouses just won't play nice. Any insight would be appreciated.

Thanks, Kirstin



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The way vantage keeps track of inventory is completely crazy. You have an on
hand QTY kept somewhere and then qty on hand before and after each
transaction is calculated by taking the current qty and working backwards in
time. Sorry if this is confusing.



We ran into an issue where a qty on a part was adjusted and in the middle
had a server issue. So the current on hand got changed but the transaction
record was not made. This in turn completely threw off the rest of the
numbers on the transaction log for that part.





~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Rose
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L





I am in the same boat. However, although I do plan to get to the bottom of
this someday, my differences have not yet been so large that I can't just
write-off the difference. One tip - You need to run the inventory reports
that you are balancing to (stock status and work in process) exactly at
month end. Even though you can select dates for these reports, the balances
seem to be unreliable if run at another time. If I run an inventory detail
listing right now for September 30, the details will be different than the
report I ran first thing in the morning on October 1.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electric <http://www.electricmirror.com>
mirror.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Kirstin
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:03 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

How do you balance your perpetual inventory to the G/L at month end? Which
reports/data do you use to do this?

We can get our non-conforming warehouses to balance, but our raw materials
and finished goods warehouses just won't play nice. Any insight would be
appreciated.

Thanks, Kirstin

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This seems pretty sensible to me. The fact that the transaction failed is problematic, but I'm not sure how else any inventory system would store this kind of data.

If you want real point-in-time snapshots of your inventory data then you need to invest in or build a data warehouse to store this information. CorVu is an option (V8), or the EPM product (E9), or something you build in MSSQL 2005 if you have the expertise, or something else.

The point here is that Vantage is an ERP system, and as such its primary job is transaction execution. The PartTran-driven history is helpful and important for planning, but it doesn't replace a real data warehouse.

ERP systems try to be all things to all people, but they're not. My $0.02.

-bws

--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix / Picometrix
    bspolarich@... ~ 734-864-5618 ~ www.advancedphotonix.com


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Charlie Wilson
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:34 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

The way vantage keeps track of inventory is completely crazy. You have an on
hand QTY kept somewhere and then qty on hand before and after each
transaction is calculated by taking the current qty and working backwards in
time. Sorry if this is confusing.



We ran into an issue where a qty on a part was adjusted and in the middle
had a server issue. So the current on hand got changed but the transaction
record was not made. This in turn completely threw off the rest of the
numbers on the transaction log for that part.





~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Rose
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L





I am in the same boat. However, although I do plan to get to the bottom of
this someday, my differences have not yet been so large that I can't just
write-off the difference. One tip - You need to run the inventory reports
that you are balancing to (stock status and work in process) exactly at
month end. Even though you can select dates for these reports, the balances
seem to be unreliable if run at another time. If I run an inventory detail
listing right now for September 30, the details will be different than the
report I ran first thing in the morning on October 1.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electric <http://www.electricmirror.com>
mirror.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Kirstin
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:03 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

How do you balance your perpetual inventory to the G/L at month end? Which
reports/data do you use to do this?

We can get our non-conforming warehouses to balance, but our raw materials
and finished goods warehouses just won't play nice. Any insight would be
appreciated.

Thanks, Kirstin

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
You are right on the the idea of the ERP system. But all I'm really asking
for is that the before and after qty for each part transaction be kept in
the DB instead of calculated on the fly when you pull the transaction log
for a part.





~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Brian W. Spolarich
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:44 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L





This seems pretty sensible to me. The fact that the transaction failed is
problematic, but I'm not sure how else any inventory system would store this
kind of data.

If you want real point-in-time snapshots of your inventory data then you
need to invest in or build a data warehouse to store this information. CorVu
is an option (V8), or the EPM product (E9), or something you build in MSSQL
2005 if you have the expertise, or something else.

The point here is that Vantage is an ERP system, and as such its primary job
is transaction execution. The PartTran-driven history is helpful and
important for planning, but it doesn't replace a real data warehouse.

ERP systems try to be all things to all people, but they're not. My $0.02.

-bws

--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix
bspolarich@advanced <mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com>
photonix.com ~ 734-864-5618 ~ www.advancedphotonix.com

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Charlie Wilson
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:34 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

The way vantage keeps track of inventory is completely crazy. You have an on
hand QTY kept somewhere and then qty on hand before and after each
transaction is calculated by taking the current qty and working backwards in
time. Sorry if this is confusing.

We ran into an issue where a qty on a part was adjusted and in the middle
had a server issue. So the current on hand got changed but the transaction
record was not made. This in turn completely threw off the rest of the
numbers on the transaction log for that part.

~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of
Thomas Rose
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

I am in the same boat. However, although I do plan to get to the bottom of
this someday, my differences have not yet been so large that I can't just
write-off the difference. One tip - You need to run the inventory reports
that you are balancing to (stock status and work in process) exactly at
month end. Even though you can select dates for these reports, the balances
seem to be unreliable if run at another time. If I run an inventory detail
listing right now for September 30, the details will be different than the
report I ran first thing in the morning on October 1.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electric <http://www.electric
<http://www.electricmirror.com> mirror.com>
mirror.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Kirstin
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:03 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

How do you balance your perpetual inventory to the G/L at month end? Which
reports/data do you use to do this?

We can get our non-conforming warehouses to balance, but our raw materials
and finished goods warehouses just won't play nice. Any insight would be
appreciated.

Thanks, Kirstin

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
BPM?

--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix / Picometrix
    bspolarich@... ~ 734-864-5618 ~ www.advancedphotonix.com


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Charlie Wilson
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:52 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

You are right on the the idea of the ERP system. But all I'm really asking
for is that the before and after qty for each part transaction be kept in
the DB instead of calculated on the fly when you pull the transaction log
for a part.





~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Brian W. Spolarich
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:44 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L





This seems pretty sensible to me. The fact that the transaction failed is
problematic, but I'm not sure how else any inventory system would store this
kind of data.

If you want real point-in-time snapshots of your inventory data then you
need to invest in or build a data warehouse to store this information. CorVu
is an option (V8), or the EPM product (E9), or something you build in MSSQL
2005 if you have the expertise, or something else.

The point here is that Vantage is an ERP system, and as such its primary job
is transaction execution. The PartTran-driven history is helpful and
important for planning, but it doesn't replace a real data warehouse.

ERP systems try to be all things to all people, but they're not. My $0.02.

-bws

--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix
bspolarich@advanced <mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com>
photonix.com ~ 734-864-5618 ~ www.advancedphotonix.com

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Charlie Wilson
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:34 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

The way vantage keeps track of inventory is completely crazy. You have an on
hand QTY kept somewhere and then qty on hand before and after each
transaction is calculated by taking the current qty and working backwards in
time. Sorry if this is confusing.

We ran into an issue where a qty on a part was adjusted and in the middle
had a server issue. So the current on hand got changed but the transaction
record was not made. This in turn completely threw off the rest of the
numbers on the transaction log for that part.

~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of
Thomas Rose
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

I am in the same boat. However, although I do plan to get to the bottom of
this someday, my differences have not yet been so large that I can't just
write-off the difference. One tip - You need to run the inventory reports
that you are balancing to (stock status and work in process) exactly at
month end. Even though you can select dates for these reports, the balances
seem to be unreliable if run at another time. If I run an inventory detail
listing right now for September 30, the details will be different than the
report I ran first thing in the morning on October 1.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electric <http://www.electric
<http://www.electricmirror.com> mirror.com>
mirror.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Kirstin
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:03 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

How do you balance your perpetual inventory to the G/L at month end? Which
reports/data do you use to do this?

We can get our non-conforming warehouses to balance, but our raw materials
and finished goods warehouses just won't play nice. Any insight would be
appreciated.

Thanks, Kirstin

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
I love creating BPMs for stuff that I feel should already be in place..
HAHA.. But I guess that is what they are there.



~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Brian W. Spolarich
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:53 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L





BPM?

--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix
bspolarich@advanced <mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com>
photonix.com ~ 734-864-5618 ~ www.advancedphotonix.com

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Charlie Wilson
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:52 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

You are right on the the idea of the ERP system. But all I'm really asking
for is that the before and after qty for each part transaction be kept in
the DB instead of calculated on the fly when you pull the transaction log
for a part.

~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of
Brian W. Spolarich
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:44 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

This seems pretty sensible to me. The fact that the transaction failed is
problematic, but I'm not sure how else any inventory system would store this
kind of data.

If you want real point-in-time snapshots of your inventory data then you
need to invest in or build a data warehouse to store this information. CorVu
is an option (V8), or the EPM product (E9), or something you build in MSSQL
2005 if you have the expertise, or something else.

The point here is that Vantage is an ERP system, and as such its primary job
is transaction execution. The PartTran-driven history is helpful and
important for planning, but it doesn't replace a real data warehouse.

ERP systems try to be all things to all people, but they're not. My $0.02.

-bws

--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix
bspolarich@advanced <mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com>
photonix.com ~ 734-864-5618 ~ www.advancedphotonix.com

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Charlie Wilson
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:34 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

The way vantage keeps track of inventory is completely crazy. You have an on
hand QTY kept somewhere and then qty on hand before and after each
transaction is calculated by taking the current qty and working backwards in
time. Sorry if this is confusing.

We ran into an issue where a qty on a part was adjusted and in the middle
had a server issue. So the current on hand got changed but the transaction
record was not made. This in turn completely threw off the rest of the
numbers on the transaction log for that part.

~Charlie

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of
Thomas Rose
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

I am in the same boat. However, although I do plan to get to the bottom of
this someday, my differences have not yet been so large that I can't just
write-off the difference. One tip - You need to run the inventory reports
that you are balancing to (stock status and work in process) exactly at
month end. Even though you can select dates for these reports, the balances
seem to be unreliable if run at another time. If I run an inventory detail
listing right now for September 30, the details will be different than the
report I ran first thing in the morning on October 1.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electric <http://www.electric
<http://www.electric <http://www.electricmirror.com> mirror.com> mirror.com>
mirror.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf Of Kirstin
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:03 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: [Vantage] Perpetual Inventory vs. G/L

How do you balance your perpetual inventory to the G/L at month end? Which
reports/data do you use to do this?

We can get our non-conforming warehouses to balance, but our raw materials
and finished goods warehouses just won't play nice. Any insight would be
appreciated.

Thanks, Kirstin

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.
<http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.
<http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups. <http://groups.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo>
yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We are still on Vantage 5.0 so unless any of this has been corrected,
these are my findings....



The main problem with running stock status reports for a prior date is
that the report will correctly calculate the quantity on-hand balance
for each part at the earlier date but it then uses the current (live)
costs to arrive at the dollar amount. What you get is yesterday's
quantities at today's costs.



In addition, if you check "Exclude parts with zero quantities" the stock
status report will exclude parts that have zero quantities TODAY even if
they had quantities at the earlier report date.





Rob McFarlin, CPA (inactive)

Controller



Accel Group, Inc.

325 Quadral Drive

Wadsworth, OH 44281

Office: 330-336-0317 x2114

Fax: 330-336-1224

E-mail: RobM@...

Web: www.AccelGrp.com <http://www.accelgrp.com/>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We run our stock status report in the middle of the night on the last day of the month so that shouldn't be an issue.

I'm wondering if we aren't somehow missing some transactions. We are looking at the G/L accounts assigned to the part classes. Occasionally someone will use the wrong part class when creating an "other" purchase order which will hit an inventory g/l account, but these are usually low dollar amounts and we can find them if we need to. I'm wondering if there isn't something that's affecting inventory, but not using the part class g/l. I've tried dumping all the part transactions for a month and trying to find anomalies, but when I do, they amount to hundreds of dollars and not the thousands that we're looking for.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Rob McFarlin" <RobM@...> wrote:
>
> We are still on Vantage 5.0 so unless any of this has been corrected,
> these are my findings....
>
>
>
> The main problem with running stock status reports for a prior date is
> that the report will correctly calculate the quantity on-hand balance
> for each part at the earlier date but it then uses the current (live)
> costs to arrive at the dollar amount. What you get is yesterday's
> quantities at today's costs.
>
>
>
> In addition, if you check "Exclude parts with zero quantities" the stock
> status report will exclude parts that have zero quantities TODAY even if
> they had quantities at the earlier report date.
>
>
>
>
>
> Rob McFarlin, CPA (inactive)
>
> Controller
>
>
>
> Accel Group, Inc.
>
> 325 Quadral Drive
>
> Wadsworth, OH 44281
>
> Office: 330-336-0317 x2114
>
> Fax: 330-336-1224
>
> E-mail: RobM@...
>
> Web: www.AccelGrp.com <http://www.accelgrp.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>