If this is fixed in 9.05 that's news to me. The search displays each PO
multiple times, one per line, even if you say "search by PO number". I
haven't called Epicor about it. Version 9.05.603.
Brian.
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Elizabeth
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 3:21 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] PO Search shows all lines
We upgraded from 9.04.506C to 507A over the weekend, with the usual
glitches and gotchas that are mostly fixed now. However, one remains...
in PO Entry or PO Tracker, if you search for a PO, it works off the
PODetail Table so the search result shows every line of every PO.
Called Epicor support... and since it was automagically fixed in 9.05
without an SCR they're not going to bother to fix it in any current or
future 9.04
It was working properly on the POHeader table in 9.04.506C, and in 505A
before that.
We have one other open issue that actually has an SCR (80290) that was
working in 9.04.505A, was broken in 506C, and the SCR is addressed in
9.05.605.
Has anyone ever had any success working with their CAM to get support
issues elevated?
Ernie Lowell
Diba Industries
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
multiple times, one per line, even if you say "search by PO number". I
haven't called Epicor about it. Version 9.05.603.
Brian.
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Elizabeth
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 3:21 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] PO Search shows all lines
We upgraded from 9.04.506C to 507A over the weekend, with the usual
glitches and gotchas that are mostly fixed now. However, one remains...
in PO Entry or PO Tracker, if you search for a PO, it works off the
PODetail Table so the search result shows every line of every PO.
Called Epicor support... and since it was automagically fixed in 9.05
without an SCR they're not going to bother to fix it in any current or
future 9.04
It was working properly on the POHeader table in 9.04.506C, and in 505A
before that.
We have one other open issue that actually has an SCR (80290) that was
working in 9.04.505A, was broken in 506C, and the SCR is addressed in
9.05.605.
Has anyone ever had any success working with their CAM to get support
issues elevated?
Ernie Lowell
Diba Industries
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]