Dwayne,
From our experiance relying on a software company to make statements
at thier user conference about something in the future. Its
just "vapor ware" until its real. (any documentation on National
Accounts published by Epicor?).
Our experiance is that large quantitiies of enhancement requests for
the same need will not guarantee, but it will help Epicor to stick
to its verbal commitment. On top of that, we do beleive 12 - 18
months is too long(in October of 2006 they said 9.0 was coming out
in 12 - 18 months). This is not a major write or re-write.
We'd like Epicor to take $100 out of our annual $48,000 maintenance
fee (= .2%) and apply it to this cause. If All 1000+ Vantage 8.0
customers would commit the same $$, Epicor could have a full time
programmer working on this for a year and still make a nice profit.
How much extra time is this costing you?
Matt S.
________________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Lisser, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 9:17 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Posting multiple accounts on one check
We raised this issue to an Epicor consultant that was working with
us.
She got back to us in March '07 with a confirmation that the National
Accounts module in Epicor 9.0 will allow us to handle this as long
as we
setup parent/child relationships for distributors having multiple
locations.
Jenn Lisser
Business Analyst
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "chrisb53029" <chris.berger@...>
wrote:
From our experiance relying on a software company to make statements
at thier user conference about something in the future. Its
just "vapor ware" until its real. (any documentation on National
Accounts published by Epicor?).
Our experiance is that large quantitiies of enhancement requests for
the same need will not guarantee, but it will help Epicor to stick
to its verbal commitment. On top of that, we do beleive 12 - 18
months is too long(in October of 2006 they said 9.0 was coming out
in 12 - 18 months). This is not a major write or re-write.
We'd like Epicor to take $100 out of our annual $48,000 maintenance
fee (= .2%) and apply it to this cause. If All 1000+ Vantage 8.0
customers would commit the same $$, Epicor could have a full time
programmer working on this for a year and still make a nice profit.
How much extra time is this costing you?
Matt S.
________________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Lisser, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 9:17 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Posting multiple accounts on one check
We raised this issue to an Epicor consultant that was working with
us.
She got back to us in March '07 with a confirmation that the National
Accounts module in Epicor 9.0 will allow us to handle this as long
as we
setup parent/child relationships for distributors having multiple
locations.
Jenn Lisser
Business Analyst
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "chrisb53029" <chris.berger@...>
wrote:
>are
> Hello, I'm new to the group. We are a new company to Epicor and
> currently installing Vantage 8.03. Through the implementation, weas
> came across this same situation and had the opportunity to list it
> a major issue, for Epicor response. They confirmed that thisthe
> functionality does not exist in 8.03. However, they did give us
> answer that in version 9 there is a new module called Nationalresponse
> Accounts that will allow one check to be applied against multiple
> accounts, if the parent child relationships are established. If
> someone else has received this answer I would be interested in
> confirming that this functionality will exist in 9.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "matt.sweny" <matts@> wrote:
> >
> > Dwayne,
> >
> > We feel your pain. Ran your problem by our controller. His
> > as follows:my
> >
> > Matt,
> >
> > This functionality would save Donna a "good" hour per week if we
> had
> > it.
> >
> > 52 weeks per year.
> >
> > You may forward my contact information along
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mitch
> > Mitchell S. Willis
> > Chief Financial Officer
> >
> > We are a small company so I could imagine this would be a "real"
> > timesaver for larger organizations.
> >
> > We would support an enhancement. I'll email you on the side with
> > email address for that enhancement form.have
> >
> > Every little bit of optimization helps. An hour here, an hour
> there,
> > and before you know it you're hiring additional staff to do work
> > arounds.(PS: this functionality should be core product, no new
> > module to buy!)
> >
> > Matt S.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "hunt.dwayne" <dwayne@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I went to the conference last week and learned that there is
> > currently
> > > no way to post multiple accounts to one check. I frequently
> > largeto
> > > checks that pay for several different accounts. I would love
> > havesave -
> > > the functionality available to post against one account -
> > thenbreaking
> > > post another account to the same check. I am currently
> > theseparately.
> > > large check into many smaller checks and posting them
> > Thisteam
> > > is time consuming and cumbersome. I spoke to several people at
> the
> > > conference that are also interested in a change. The support
> > atthe
> > > Epicor suggested that I request an enhancement for this in a
> > future
> > > patch/version. They need more folks to request the same
> > enhancement to
> > > make this happen. My question to all of you is.....who's
> > interested??
> > > If you would e mail me your contact information I'll send you
> > > enhancement sheet to fill out and send in to Epicor. The more
> > people
> > > that send in the form the better chance we've got to get it
> > changed.
> > >
> >
>