Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1/Attn:R.Bruton

Our volume, like yours, is also very low. We purchased 2 Datamax E-4203 label printers several months ago. Inexpensive and , so far, not a single problem. They are in a
relatively clean office environment directly off our plant. Even though our volume is very low, we purchased 2 of them and have them running on separate pc's so we would
have a backup in anticipation of the inevitable computer crash.


Marty Kuphall
Controller
Ultra Tool & Mfg., Inc.

Ph. 262-703-0455
Fx. 262-703-0468

marty.kuphall@...
Robert Bruton wrote:

> Our volume is 10 to 15 labels a day (on a busy day). Sometimes we may need
> to print 100 labels at a time but it is rare. Real low volume.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: All American Products [mailto:miket@...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:27 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1/Attn:R.Bruton
>
> We have been using Zebra 105Se 200dpi thermal printer since 1998. The number
> of labels can reach up to 750 a day for inventory and around 250 for
> shipping. We had no problems with any of two printers so far. The bar codes
> are printed successfully. One drawback they are not cheap, around $1500.00
> but they do worth it.
>
> Mike Tonoyan / MIS Manager
> All American Products Co.
> miket@...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Les Tingley" <ltingley@...>
> To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:17 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1/Attn:R.Bruton
>
> > Just a word of caution on the Sato CX200. We bought 4 at about $500.00
> each.
> > Within a year, two were dead. When I tried to get them serviced (Through
> > their authorized Service Centers) I was told that they were considered
> > throw-aways. Not worth servicing, and not meant to handle industrial
> > volumes. These units are made of mostly plastic. Best suited for office
> type
> > environments. Our Purchasing Agent (Rest his soul) bought them, sight
> > unseen, through mail order. I wouldn't buy these again. Just my 2 cents
> > worth.... Les
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Robert Bruton [SMTP:bob@...]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:59 PM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've been looking for a replacement for my old dot matrix tractor feed
> > > label
> > > printer that doesn't cost too much. Looked up this Sato printer. Looks
> > > pretty good. Does anyone have any experience or recommendations on
> label
> > > printers for Vantage. We don't print bar codes at this time.
> Inventory,
> > > receiving and shipping labels.
> > >
> > > Bob Bruton
> > > Entek
> > > -----
> > >
> > > I'm having problems printing my shipping labels in 5.1. We use a Sato
> > > CX200 Label Printer. I can print these labels to every other printer,
> > > but the Sato. I can also print non-vantage data to the Sato. I can
> > > print to it directly out of Crystal 8.0, but not through Vantage. Any
> > > words of wisdom? Anybody on 5.1 with a recommendation for a good
> > > Label printer? Must be roll labels, one across. We make our own.
> > >
> > > Thanks - Les

--
Just a word of caution on the Sato CX200. We bought 4 at about $500.00 each.
Within a year, two were dead. When I tried to get them serviced (Through
their authorized Service Centers) I was told that they were considered
throw-aways. Not worth servicing, and not meant to handle industrial
volumes. These units are made of mostly plastic. Best suited for office type
environments. Our Purchasing Agent (Rest his soul) bought them, sight
unseen, through mail order. I wouldn't buy these again. Just my 2 cents
worth.... Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Bruton [SMTP:bob@...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:59 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been looking for a replacement for my old dot matrix tractor feed
> label
> printer that doesn't cost too much. Looked up this Sato printer. Looks
> pretty good. Does anyone have any experience or recommendations on label
> printers for Vantage. We don't print bar codes at this time. Inventory,
> receiving and shipping labels.
>
> Bob Bruton
> Entek
> -----
>
> I'm having problems printing my shipping labels in 5.1. We use a Sato
> CX200 Label Printer. I can print these labels to every other printer,
> but the Sato. I can also print non-vantage data to the Sato. I can
> print to it directly out of Crystal 8.0, but not through Vantage. Any
> words of wisdom? Anybody on 5.1 with a recommendation for a good
> Label printer? Must be roll labels, one across. We make our own.
>
> Thanks - Les
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
We have been using Zebra 105Se 200dpi thermal printer since 1998. The number
of labels can reach up to 750 a day for inventory and around 250 for
shipping. We had no problems with any of two printers so far. The bar codes
are printed successfully. One drawback they are not cheap, around $1500.00
but they do worth it.

Mike Tonoyan / MIS Manager
All American Products Co.
miket@...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Les Tingley" <ltingley@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:17 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1/Attn:R.Bruton


> Just a word of caution on the Sato CX200. We bought 4 at about $500.00
each.
> Within a year, two were dead. When I tried to get them serviced (Through
> their authorized Service Centers) I was told that they were considered
> throw-aways. Not worth servicing, and not meant to handle industrial
> volumes. These units are made of mostly plastic. Best suited for office
type
> environments. Our Purchasing Agent (Rest his soul) bought them, sight
> unseen, through mail order. I wouldn't buy these again. Just my 2 cents
> worth.... Les
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Bruton [SMTP:bob@...]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:59 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been looking for a replacement for my old dot matrix tractor feed
> > label
> > printer that doesn't cost too much. Looked up this Sato printer. Looks
> > pretty good. Does anyone have any experience or recommendations on
label
> > printers for Vantage. We don't print bar codes at this time.
Inventory,
> > receiving and shipping labels.
> >
> > Bob Bruton
> > Entek
> > -----
> >
> > I'm having problems printing my shipping labels in 5.1. We use a Sato
> > CX200 Label Printer. I can print these labels to every other printer,
> > but the Sato. I can also print non-vantage data to the Sato. I can
> > print to it directly out of Crystal 8.0, but not through Vantage. Any
> > words of wisdom? Anybody on 5.1 with a recommendation for a good
> > Label printer? Must be roll labels, one across. We make our own.
> >
> > Thanks - Les
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> > have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> > (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and
> > Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> > (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> > (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Our volume is 10 to 15 labels a day (on a busy day). Sometimes we may need
to print 100 labels at a time but it is rare. Real low volume.


-----Original Message-----
From: All American Products [mailto:miket@...]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:27 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1/Attn:R.Bruton


We have been using Zebra 105Se 200dpi thermal printer since 1998. The number
of labels can reach up to 750 a day for inventory and around 250 for
shipping. We had no problems with any of two printers so far. The bar codes
are printed successfully. One drawback they are not cheap, around $1500.00
but they do worth it.

Mike Tonoyan / MIS Manager
All American Products Co.
miket@...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Les Tingley" <ltingley@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:17 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1/Attn:R.Bruton


> Just a word of caution on the Sato CX200. We bought 4 at about $500.00
each.
> Within a year, two were dead. When I tried to get them serviced (Through
> their authorized Service Centers) I was told that they were considered
> throw-aways. Not worth servicing, and not meant to handle industrial
> volumes. These units are made of mostly plastic. Best suited for office
type
> environments. Our Purchasing Agent (Rest his soul) bought them, sight
> unseen, through mail order. I wouldn't buy these again. Just my 2 cents
> worth.... Les
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Bruton [SMTP:bob@...]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:59 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [Vantage] Printing Shipping Labels in 5.1
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been looking for a replacement for my old dot matrix tractor feed
> > label
> > printer that doesn't cost too much. Looked up this Sato printer. Looks
> > pretty good. Does anyone have any experience or recommendations on
label
> > printers for Vantage. We don't print bar codes at this time.
Inventory,
> > receiving and shipping labels.
> >
> > Bob Bruton
> > Entek
> > -----
> >
> > I'm having problems printing my shipping labels in 5.1. We use a Sato
> > CX200 Label Printer. I can print these labels to every other printer,
> > but the Sato. I can also print non-vantage data to the Sato. I can
> > print to it directly out of Crystal 8.0, but not through Vantage. Any
> > words of wisdom? Anybody on 5.1 with a recommendation for a good
> > Label printer? Must be roll labels, one across. We make our own.
> >
> > Thanks - Les
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> > have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> > (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and
> > Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.>
> > (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
> > (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links>
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> >
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.>
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
>



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=216105.1806326.3318126.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050071
83:HM/A=915130/R=0/O=1/I=brandr-lrec/postholidaygroup/*http://shopping.yahoo
.com/domain?d=holiday&cf=posthol01>

<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=216105.1806326.3318126.1261774/D=egroupmai
l/S=1705007183:HM/A=915130/rand=517656733>

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.>
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links>

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]