Progressively Receive Labor and Inventory on Job

Most is being handled manually.
with about 4 exception reports run at the end of the day.
Most labor and material problems are caught here.

Also, on MES, we have a BPM that pops up an alert if Completed qty is greater than job qty. This fixed most material qty problems.
Too much at least.
There is still a problem with an autoreceive operation being completed without all the materials bring issued. We rely on daily exception reports for these too. (I was told by Epicor there was no way to prevent these with a BPM but... that was a long time ago).

Please let me know if you find better solutions...


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jobando018" <eltico_018@...> wrote:
>
> Before an operation is completed, any labor applied to a job is represented as manufacture variance in the my WIP Reconciliation report.
>
> What I meant to say by "receive" is that the manufacture variance becomes zero when the quantity produce is bigger or equal to the job quantity.
>
> My goal is to prevent any manufacture variance on a job due to time and expense entries.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "cooner_55421" <cooner_55421@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > >We would like to be able to receive labor progressively
> > I have some operations that can span several weeks.
> > You have my interest but, I'm not quite sure what you mean by "receive" labor progressively
> > I assume it has nothing to do with Capture COS/WIP.
> > Can you expand a little?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jobando018" <eltico_018@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Good Day Epicor Experts.
> > >
> > > I am running Epicor 9.05.602a. When on enters labor in to a job, labor and inventory are not applied until the last labor entry and the job quantity is reached. I believe time and expense calls it Operation Complete.
> > >
> > > The issue with my situation is that Jobs can last for days and we would not be able to detect labor issues until the Jobs is completed. We would like to be able to receive labor progressively as time and expense entries are entered by using BPMs or any type of customization.
> > >
> > > Thanks For any suggestions
> > > --Joel Obando
> > >
> >
>
Good Day Epicor Experts.

I am running Epicor 9.05.602a. When on enters labor in to a job, labor and inventory are not applied until the last labor entry and the job quantity is reached. I believe time and expense calls it Operation Complete.

The issue with my situation is that Jobs can last for days and we would not be able to detect labor issues until the Jobs is completed. We would like to be able to receive labor progressively as time and expense entries are entered by using BPMs or any type of customization.

Thanks For any suggestions
--Joel Obando
Before an operation is completed, any labor applied to a job is represented as manufacture variance in the my WIP Reconciliation report.

What I meant to say by "receive" is that the manufacture variance becomes zero when the quantity produce is bigger or equal to the job quantity.

My goal is to prevent any manufacture variance on a job due to time and expense entries.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "cooner_55421" <cooner_55421@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> >We would like to be able to receive labor progressively
> I have some operations that can span several weeks.
> You have my interest but, I'm not quite sure what you mean by "receive" labor progressively
> I assume it has nothing to do with Capture COS/WIP.
> Can you expand a little?
>
> Thanks
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jobando018" <eltico_018@> wrote:
> >
> > Good Day Epicor Experts.
> >
> > I am running Epicor 9.05.602a. When on enters labor in to a job, labor and inventory are not applied until the last labor entry and the job quantity is reached. I believe time and expense calls it Operation Complete.
> >
> > The issue with my situation is that Jobs can last for days and we would not be able to detect labor issues until the Jobs is completed. We would like to be able to receive labor progressively as time and expense entries are entered by using BPMs or any type of customization.
> >
> > Thanks For any suggestions
> > --Joel Obando
> >
>