Quote Worksheet Not Calculating Correction 9.05.702a

Yahoo Archive
1

Hi De Anna,

 

Have you heard of any progress on this error?  We are upgrading to 9.05.702A hopefully early June (from 9.05.607B) and have the same problem. 

 

It's stupid, really, Epicor has taken the burden part of material cost(s) and added it to burden breakdown on worksheet, and labor part of material cost(s) and added it to labor part of worksheet.  I already have the material in inventory... I already paid that part for it ~ why now on quote would I want to take it into account?  It should be fixed back to the way it was, so that I can see my labor for this quote line without old material labor costs added in, and burden for my quote line without old material burden added in!

 

We really need a fix for this too.

 

Nancy

2
Epicor's Vista/Vantage/E9 User's Group

Hello Everyone

 

I have been using Epicor products (Vantage and Epicor 9) since 1997. We recently upgraded to version .702a form .700c. I now notice that the material worksheet does not calculate the material cost correctly. It also does not load the markup for the material from Markup template. Both of these are known issues.

 

I am bringing this two your attention for three reasons.

 

1.      Those of you have not discovered the problem, may be pricing their product wrong. This happened to me.

2.      How many of you are also experiencing this issue?

3.      Epicor knows of the issue and says they are targeting version .703 for a fix. I need an immediate fix. I am upset that this is not being given urgent priority.

 

If you need specifics on the problem, let me know.

Your feedback is appreciated.

 

Thank you,

De Anna Mirzadegan

 

McNeal Enterprises, Inc.  | 2031 Ringwood Avenue  |  San Jose, CA 95131

Phone (408) 922-7290  |  Fax (408) 922-0728

www.mcneal.com

 

3
We are seeing this with quoting on the worksheet when we use 5% scrap on the
material and we are quoting 1 piece. The piece price appears to be 5% off.
Our calculations for material for 1 piece is a small fraction of a pound
(our material starts in pounds but 1 piece calculated in grams), so the
rounding or something appears to be not working correctly. When we quote
100 pieces, the piece price comes out right. We are on 9.05.702a, also.

Bethany Rye
Epicor Business Analyst

<http://www.teampti.com/>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]