This may be problem beyond the means of the forum.
When entering accounts for a project-program, an account # is treated as a part number; a top-job created for that account-P/N. Multiple lower jobs are later created that report to this top job.
I am told of a problem: when rolling up costs to the project, these accounts-P/Ns roll-up the actual costs as strictly material costs–rather than labor costs as actually applied.
First, is it correct to make an account # a part number (P/N)?
Second, if you do that, will the problem of labor costs, as described, occur?
.
Hello,
We have the same issue. We just converted to Kinetic 2021 (v11.1.100) from a really old version (Vantage 6.1) and now all of our subassembly labor costs report “up” as material costs. I don’t see the same check box for “enable mfg cost elements” as shown in 10.2.200. I want to check the bottom lefthand corner “get details from job for job” and figured asking here might be an easy step before testing in Pilot.
Thanks,
John
