Service Connect - Ending a sub-workflow

The main workflow is called "SC_Quote/01_Main" with a schema called Quote_v2.xsd.

The sub-workflow is called "SC_Quote/02_NewLine" with a schema called QuoteNewLine_v2.xsd.



--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@...> wrote:
>
> Ok, what are the names of your schemas in this workflow. ie.. Main;
> Main_EachPart.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Blake Clemens
>
> IT Systems Engineer
>
> Delmarva Millwork Corporation
>
> (800) 360-2364 x132
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Aaron
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 10:27 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Service Connect - Ending a sub-workflow
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, that's what I'm doing. I can detect the "error" condition and jump
> to the end of the sub-workflow. That works great.
>
> Unfortunately, Service Connect merrily continues on with line 6 next.
> I'd like to be able to abort the entire sub-workflow and all subsequent
> lines.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@> wrote:
> >
> > What if you added a "Choice" to the subworkflow? If you added the line
> > error free then continue as normal but if an error has occurred that
> > jump to the end.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Blake Clemens
> >
> > IT Systems Engineer
> >
> > Delmarva Millwork Corporation
> >
> > (800) 360-2364 x132
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> > Of Aaron
> > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 10:17 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Service Connect - Ending a sub-workflow
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Is it possible to halt the processing of a sub-workflow?
> >
> > For example, I have a workflow that creates a header record. It starts
> a
> > sub-workflow to add 25 lines. Line 5 has some sort of error. Is it
> > possible to have the sub-workflow exit there, return control to the
> main
> > workflow and not continue processing line 6?
> >
> > TIA,
> > Aaron
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Is it possible to halt the processing of a sub-workflow?

For example, I have a workflow that creates a header record. It starts a sub-workflow to add 25 lines. Line 5 has some sort of error. Is it possible to have the sub-workflow exit there, return control to the main workflow and not continue processing line 6?

TIA,
Aaron
What if you added a "Choice" to the subworkflow? If you added the line
error free then continue as normal but if an error has occurred that
jump to the end.



Thanks,

Blake Clemens

IT Systems Engineer

Delmarva Millwork Corporation

(800) 360-2364 x132

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Aaron
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 10:17 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Service Connect - Ending a sub-workflow





Is it possible to halt the processing of a sub-workflow?

For example, I have a workflow that creates a header record. It starts a
sub-workflow to add 25 lines. Line 5 has some sort of error. Is it
possible to have the sub-workflow exit there, return control to the main
workflow and not continue processing line 6?

TIA,
Aaron





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Well, that's what I'm doing. I can detect the "error" condition and jump to the end of the sub-workflow. That works great.

Unfortunately, Service Connect merrily continues on with line 6 next. I'd like to be able to abort the entire sub-workflow and all subsequent lines.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@...> wrote:
>
> What if you added a "Choice" to the subworkflow? If you added the line
> error free then continue as normal but if an error has occurred that
> jump to the end.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Blake Clemens
>
> IT Systems Engineer
>
> Delmarva Millwork Corporation
>
> (800) 360-2364 x132
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Aaron
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 10:17 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Service Connect - Ending a sub-workflow
>
>
>
>
>
> Is it possible to halt the processing of a sub-workflow?
>
> For example, I have a workflow that creates a header record. It starts a
> sub-workflow to add 25 lines. Line 5 has some sort of error. Is it
> possible to have the sub-workflow exit there, return control to the main
> workflow and not continue processing line 6?
>
> TIA,
> Aaron
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Ok, what are the names of your schemas in this workflow. ie.. Main;
Main_EachPart.



Thanks,

Blake Clemens

IT Systems Engineer

Delmarva Millwork Corporation

(800) 360-2364 x132

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Aaron
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 10:27 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Service Connect - Ending a sub-workflow





Well, that's what I'm doing. I can detect the "error" condition and jump
to the end of the sub-workflow. That works great.

Unfortunately, Service Connect merrily continues on with line 6 next.
I'd like to be able to abort the entire sub-workflow and all subsequent
lines.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@...> wrote:
>
> What if you added a "Choice" to the subworkflow? If you added the line
> error free then continue as normal but if an error has occurred that
> jump to the end.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Blake Clemens
>
> IT Systems Engineer
>
> Delmarva Millwork Corporation
>
> (800) 360-2364 x132
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
> Of Aaron
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 10:17 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Service Connect - Ending a sub-workflow
>
>
>
>
>
> Is it possible to halt the processing of a sub-workflow?
>
> For example, I have a workflow that creates a header record. It starts
a
> sub-workflow to add 25 lines. Line 5 has some sort of error. Is it
> possible to have the sub-workflow exit there, return control to the
main
> workflow and not continue processing line 6?
>
> TIA,
> Aaron
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]