Vic -
Haven't personally done this one but for an idea. You could try to use
a BAM on the XFileAttch table.
A rule to validate that the key is a job number and RelatedToFile is a
job. Once the rules are met,
have the BAM action send out an email.
Thank you in advance,
Calvin Dekker
Email: calvin@... <mailto:calvin@...>
http://www.codabears.com <http://www.codabears.com>
<http://www.codabears.com/>
*New software/hardware Support & Maintenance Programs
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 8:31 AM
To: calvind
Subject: [Vantage] Trigger Email Alert when Attaching an Attachment to a
Job
I'm somewhat new to email alerts, but is this possible (asking for a
friend)? If a user attaches a file to a Job, can this send out an email
alert? It doesn't have to a fancy or detailed, just the job # would
suffice. This is a Progress database.
Thank you in advance.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Haven't personally done this one but for an idea. You could try to use
a BAM on the XFileAttch table.
A rule to validate that the key is a job number and RelatedToFile is a
job. Once the rules are met,
have the BAM action send out an email.
Thank you in advance,
Calvin Dekker
Email: calvin@... <mailto:calvin@...>
http://www.codabears.com <http://www.codabears.com>
<http://www.codabears.com/>
*New software/hardware Support & Maintenance Programs
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 8:31 AM
To: calvind
Subject: [Vantage] Trigger Email Alert when Attaching an Attachment to a
Job
I'm somewhat new to email alerts, but is this possible (asking for a
friend)? If a user attaches a file to a Job, can this send out an email
alert? It doesn't have to a fancy or detailed, just the job # would
suffice. This is a Progress database.
Thank you in advance.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]