I have seen some discussions on scrap costs, but I am still a little unclear on what is going on. I think we have something stramge going on.
For example, if we run a job with 10 parts. Lets say 9 are good and 1 is bad. The Production Detail report will show the Actual Job cost to be lets $10,000. Then the unit cost should be $1000 (10,000/10), but instead it will show it as $1111.11 (10,000/9). So it is calculating the unit cost by dividing the job cost by the number of good parts rather than the number of all parts.
Also, in this scenario, the line that shows QA Adj will show a material cost that is way out of the ballpark. We have tried to figure out where it is getting the number but it almost seems random or like a divide by 0 took place somewhere. For example on the job we are using as a test, the whole job cost was around $85k and the QA Adj total was $-43k, and only 1 part was scrapped out of 15.
We had the "Move Costs to DMR" box checked in the Quality Assurance configuration. We are going to run the same scenario on our Test system with that box off to see if we get a different result.
Anyone seens this or have any insight into how these things are being calculated?
For example, if we run a job with 10 parts. Lets say 9 are good and 1 is bad. The Production Detail report will show the Actual Job cost to be lets $10,000. Then the unit cost should be $1000 (10,000/10), but instead it will show it as $1111.11 (10,000/9). So it is calculating the unit cost by dividing the job cost by the number of good parts rather than the number of all parts.
Also, in this scenario, the line that shows QA Adj will show a material cost that is way out of the ballpark. We have tried to figure out where it is getting the number but it almost seems random or like a divide by 0 took place somewhere. For example on the job we are using as a test, the whole job cost was around $85k and the QA Adj total was $-43k, and only 1 part was scrapped out of 15.
We had the "Move Costs to DMR" box checked in the Quality Assurance configuration. We are going to run the same scenario on our Test system with that box off to see if we get a different result.
Anyone seens this or have any insight into how these things are being calculated?