aidacra
(Nathan your friendly neighborhood Support Engineer)
4
seems like there wasn’t heavy use of UD fields in E905 based on the 13 seconds of processing under the UDFieldMigration phase (13 seconds is really fast for this phase) - not bring over all of the unused but predefined UD fields from earlier versions into E10.x has been a huge benefit to DB sizes.
@aidacra - it went well. we had one issue where we had an error of insufficient memory in resource poo. Once we changed the max server memory to use 8GB less than what is installed on the server the migration completed successfully. We knew we would have errors in BAQ/Dashboards and customization’s so no surprise there. We are currently finishing up verifying customization’s that didn’t validate and I am working on a few Crystal reports updates to RDDs - we will continue to use Crystal reports for already existing customized reports from E9 and then move them to SSRS as needed.
Migration took approximately 5 hrs to complete.
Kristine Fierce
1 Like
aidacra
(Nathan your friendly neighborhood Support Engineer)
10
glad to hear that it was successful and that the migration process itself took less than a day; great feedback. Was the resultant 10.1.500.x database smaller than the starting E9.05.702a database?