ECO Table Vantage 6.1

Have you exited entirely from RB then gone back in and re-run the report? Also worth trying, exit form RB AND Vantage and empty the local mfgwrk61 folder then go back in and try running it again. I've seen RB ignore data changes while in development many times.
-Todd C.


________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of stanchmura
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:33 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] ECO Table Vantage 6.1




I am attempting to write a Report Builder query from the ECORev table. I've included the field labeled "Revision Comments" from the program screen (Revision Maintenance,) which is labeled RevDescription in Report Builder. Oddly that field did not print consistently. i.e. some text shows on the report and can be seen/verified at the program screen. However I added some new text and changed some existing. But the report does not reflect the additions or changes to the RevDescription field.

At first I thought there was something peculiar about that field, but when making the changes in Rev header, the user ID and effectivity date also was changed. Those changes show on screen but not the report! Has anyone run across this and/or have an explanation as why?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I am attempting to write a Report Builder query from the ECORev table. I've included the field labeled "Revision Comments" from the program screen (Revision Maintenance,) which is labeled RevDescription in Report Builder. Oddly that field did not print consistently. i.e. some text shows on the report and can be seen/verified at the program screen. However I added some new text and changed some existing. But the report does not reflect the additions or changes to the RevDescription field.

At first I thought there was something peculiar about that field, but when making the changes in Rev header, the user ID and effectivity date also was changed. Those changes show on screen but not the report! Has anyone run across this and/or have an explanation as why?