We are using the built in table UD01 to populate some custom data, and when I created a searchable text field to search that table, it returns all the column headers and the default names. Is there any way to rename these Column names?
I don’t believe there is a way to change the Key fields, but believe you can change the other fields labels in extended properties. If you really want to go crazy, you can use a UD table off of a UD table and create all the fields you want except for the Key fields.
Thanks everyone for the advice. I have changed ShortChar01 Label to Program Name in the Extended Properties, but when I search that table, it doesn’t return that value, still stuck on ShortChar01. Is this not what Label does? Or is it another field that dictates what column label presents when the table is searched?
Personally, I regularly create UDxx_UD tables with the UD fields that I want. I’d much rather have a field named “CustomerRef_c” than ShortChar02 when I’m creating BAQ’s, reports, dashboards, etc. It only takes a few extra minutes to create them, the overhead on the table is minimal, but the clarity that it gives for years to come is worth it.
Yes, the label field is for customizations and reports that you would build, not the out of the box ones. @SimsTrak better explained what I was referencing earlier with a UD table hanging off a UDxx table. That way, you control all of the field names and descriptions.
Hi @SimsTrak
So I would be fine doing this, but for some reason, when I use the searchable textbox the custom fields return empty. I have BAQ’d the table and there is data in those columns, but the search function doesn’t return any values. I have attached some screenshots.
You may need to reference all 5 Key fields. Also I’m going to assume you’ve verified that there is a row in UD01 where Key1 matches Project.ProgramName_c.
I have referenced all 5 fields the UBAQ I’m using currently to update this table. Project.ProgrameName_c is a custom field in the Project table that I am filling with a search on the UD01 table. Does that clarify what I am trying to do? This all works as I want with the predefined fields (Key01, ShortChar01, ShortChar02, Date01, and Date02) but when I search for those, the columns don’t provide info that is useful for the user.
Because these values are used in multiple tables. I figure it would be better to have the data in a table that the other tables reference instead of recreating them in multiple places.
I don’t know what the eventual use of this field or the data is, it was discussed by my leadership team and they are adamant on its existence.
I’d agree that Key01 should always exist, but there’s still the issue where the data isn’t populating in the UD columns, even when I have BAQ’d the custom columns and the data does exist, if you have seen the screenshots where the BAQ has data and the search results yield nothing in those columns
@mackenziem , I think you are going to describe exactly what you are trying to do. Literally step by step.
You are only providing us with where you are having issues and without knowing what the business requirements are and what you have already tried, we may not be able to help.