Jessica,
Awesome… hope it doesn’t happen again… It’s concerning how this happened… is there a bug in there somewhere? Did Mtl Seq 310 ever exist? How did 10 end up as 310 in PartDtl? Was 310 deleted and PartDtl didn’t update… If you run into this again you might want to report it to Epicor Support, probably a bug.
You can probably modify your BAQ to just show you ‘orphaned’ PartDtl records, so you can keep an eye on this if you want.
-Rick
www.getaligned.solutions