Frideas! 6/13/2025


Designed by Freepik.com

On Friday, it’s EpiUsers Frideas Day! Have you been to the Epicor Ideas Portal recently? If so, are there some ideas you want to encourage other users to vote for? Maybe want to add comments to an existing idea?

2 Likes

These two need to be merged AND voted for.

Ability to filter custom vs. non-custom elements | Epicor Ideas Portal
Kinetic Layer Custom Events - Make Easier To | Epicor Ideas Portal

7 Likes

I would like to promote my colleague’s, @swilliasc111, ideas to enhance the Request Mobile Approval task within ECM.

ECM Communications from Emails
Mobile Approval Subject / Trigger Notifications

Thank you!

1 Like

Kinetic Field Help Missing Data in Classic Field Help (Parity Issue)

Ability to customize Quick Ship report datasets (think Kinetic RDD)

Kinetic is missing Broker data for International Shipments

Add shipping carrier “Accessorial” Fields for shipments

This has been a thorn in my side before and it’d be nice to see this fixed. Phantom Pack Details Part & Qty per Phantom

3 Likes

I like this idea, as the functionality exists for functions and bpms already

https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/FRM-I-20

Not my Idea, but long a pet peeve of mine: Read Only - User - Site Access

If you have access to view two sites, you have equal ability to transact or edit in those sites. There is no way to declare one site as transactable and the other as read-only for that user.

I usually want people to transact in only one site, but I am fine if they research things in the other site.

Like transfers. Go ahead and see if the other site has any before you request it. But I don’t want you to be able to SHIP it from the other site and then receive it into yours!

Main irritation is BAQs.

But I ran into this today with Part Tracker and the On Hand (Activity) sections - even the Bins were restricted by site access.

Part Where Used (native but happens to be BAQ-based) also restricts by site.

(And then POs and sales orders, I think you can make releases for other sites even without access to them, right?)

2 Likes

You can’t vote for it but I will post it anyway.
Improve or replace help platform

6 Likes

404 Error

1 Like

Not released to vote on yet!

I literally said you can’t vote on it lol.

7 Likes

But it wasn’t in the picture.

image

2 Likes

Yeah I just realized that before you replied. Touché.

1 Like

A little bit of self promotion, but we need better visibility of method costing.

https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-6504

1 Like

You expect us to read?!?!

6 Likes

On a Friday even! The nerve.

4 Likes

Display context clues in browser client tab names

You know, like this:
image

Imagine having several Epiusers threads open, but all their tab names were simply “Epiusers” instead of the thread title, and you had to click around to find where the one you’re thinking of is or if it’s even open somewhere. It’s super helpful that Epiusers puts context in the tab names.

What if Kinetic did that?

5 Likes

Doesn’t it already?
image

My personal Favs this week:
Sales Order Delivery plan
Part on the fly visibility
Perpetual MRP
New TranType Table to hold descriptions and actions for trantypes.

2 Likes

The baq and app studio tabs just say home.

2 Likes