Memory Cache - Any Risk?

Yahoo Archive
1
No risk until the user decides to cache every tracker in the system. It can cause crashes in Vantage when too many programs are cached. It doesn't seem to matter whether they have 2, 3 or 4gb of memory in their machine either, at least on Windows XP 32 bit. We are slowly getting people upgraded to Windows 7 64 bit so the verdict is still out on it.

Charles Carden
IT Manager
Manitex, Inc.
Georgetown, Texas
----- Original Message -----
From: Vic Drecchio
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 8:29 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Memory Cache - Any Risk?



I showed a couple of my users the “Memory Cache” option for the screens (Tools – Options – Memory Cache)... makes them load much faster and now they’re setting this option on many screens.

Is there any downside to this? I can’t think of any. I’m sure client patches will still roll out when needed.

Thanks.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
I showed a couple of my users the “Memory Cache” option for the screens (Tools – Options – Memory Cache)... makes them load much faster and now they’re setting this option on many screens.

Is there any downside to this? I can’t think of any. I’m sure client patches will still roll out when needed.

Thanks.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
The only issue I know of, is if you change a customization it can take a
little while to get out to people that mem-caching enabled. But it's
probably not something you're gonna have to deal with day to day.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> I showed a couple of my users the �Memory Cache� option for the screens
> (Tools � Options � Memory Cache)... makes them load much faster and now
> they�re setting this option on many screens.
>
> Is there any downside to this? I can�t think of any. I�m sure client
> patches will still roll out when needed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>



--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
The biggest risk is people caching too much, as long as Epicor is open, those screens will stay in memory and if they cache too many screens, it can cripple the performance on the client because there isn't free memory available to be used.

Also, it shouldn't affect customizations being rolled out since the cache is cleared every time the program is restarted on the client machine.

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:30 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Memory Cache - Any Risk?

I showed a couple of my users the “Memory Cache” option for the screens (Tools – Options – Memory Cache)... makes them load much faster and now they’re setting this option on many screens.

Is there any downside to this? I can’t think of any. I’m sure client patches will still roll out when needed.

Thanks.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
5
Is anyone running Epicor SQL server in NetApp storage device? Netapp is offering RAID “DP”, Diagonal Parity. Epicor had always required RAID 1 or RAID 10. Any reply will be much appreciated.



Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.

mtonoyan@...


______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
______________________________________________________________________


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
6
We aren't doing it. However I spoke with a fellow at perspectives that was
running Netapp boxes and spoke highly of them.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> Is anyone running Epicor SQL server in NetApp storage device? Netapp is
> offering RAID �DP�, Diagonal Parity. Epicor had always required RAID 1 or
> RAID 10. Any reply will be much appreciated.
>
> Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
>
> mtonoyan@...
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and
> is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure
> to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this
> information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with
> all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
> __________________________________________________________
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>



--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
7
Thanks!

Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
mtonoyan@...


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Waffqle
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:51 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] NetApp with RAID "DP"

We aren't doing it. However I spoke with a fellow at perspectives that
was
running Netapp boxes and spoke highly of them.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Mike Tonoyan
<mtonoyan@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> Is anyone running Epicor SQL server in NetApp storage device? Netapp
is
> offering RAID "DP", Diagonal Parity. Epicor had always required RAID 1
or
> RAID 10. Any reply will be much appreciated.
>
> Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
>
> mtonoyan@...
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information
and
> is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or
disclosure
> to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this
> information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply
with
> all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
> __________________________________________________________
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>



--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links




______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
______________________________________________________________________