Project Accounting

If your projects fit Vantage's definition... it works. Ours doesn't, but since our problem isn't unique, Epicor would do well to do something about. I can see it now... ETO module... more $.

Thanks, Scott. We do something similar in Excel.

----- Original Message -----
From: "brychanwilliams" <brychanw@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:03 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Project Accounting


Well,

Wow... I have been looking at your posts from afar. Would it be fair to say that vantage doesn't really embrace project type work? I understand that 'projects' was tagged on to the system but it would be great just to post a misc invoice(ap) to a project. But we are not using projects to generate wip then cos then invoice etc.

In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...> wrote:

Hello Chris,

I apologize for the long delay in responding, but here's a brief summary of what we have in place. More work remains, but at least we're moving in the right direction now. At least I think we are...

I just uploaded a Report Builder report that calculates, for every open make-to-order job linked to a sales order release flagged as subject to percentage-of-completion accounting, the actual job costs-to-date, the percentage-of-completion ratio and the resulting earned revenue-to-date. In turn, it totals invoiced-to-date and compares that value to the earned revenue-to-date to determine over- and under-billing. This report is, without a doubt, the most complicated one that I have ever created in Report Builder, so suffice it to say that there are probably better ways to do what I have done in it and that Crystal Reports is probably much better suited to the task. At some point, I will need to convert it from RB to CR.

The report is dependent upon the proper use of several user-defined fields, some of which are set up in VB forms. In sales order releases, we have a VB form where we designate a planner and whether the release is subject to PoC. In the corresponding job headers, we use one of the check-off boxes (JobHead.CheckOff2) to indicate that the job is 'ready for PoC' and one of the user fields (JobHead.UserInteger1) to enter the estimated cost from our quote. From there, everything else happens in the report. Again, there are probably better ways to do this, but this is the outcome to date of my trials and errors (of which there have been plenty). Our company president would like to see some cash flow forecasting added to the report based on anticipated milestone billings, so I still have that challenge ahead of me. If you have any ideas, please share.

I hope this helps!

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Project Accounting

You're the only one, so far. One problem is the percentage complete revenue recognition, negotiated invoicing and over/under billings between the two. This we would like Vantage to be more helpful with.

Another is Engineer Purchasing for Engineer To Order, which we can mostly solve with V8 customization. But Vantage 8.0.805e still corrupts seven of our large jobs and PO contact phone numbers don't appear on the screen properly when using a Purchase Point. Purchasing is THE most important activity for engineers in Vantage and has to work and be friendly.

We can't go to V8 until its problems are resolved.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Hey Chris, just wanted to let you know that I haven't forgotten about this, but I just haven't taken the time to summarize our process yet. Have you received a reply from anyone else?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:10 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Electroimpact is strictly Engineer To Order (no Inventory) and 15-20 jobs at any one time require percentage-complete accounting which we do in Excel using Vantage data and then post back to Vantage manually. We use Miscellaneous Shipments, not Customer Shipments for these jobs, as we're shipping a unique machine, some assemble jet aircraft wings, in containers which are reassembled/tested by us at the customer site. Our estimated job costs are fairly accurate while our actual costs are accurate as we track all dollars and hours for everyone working on the job -- engineers, inspectors, machinists and technicians -- with true pay rates in Vantage. Overtime $ is automatically applied to the jobs through custom programming. Overhead is allocated based on labor $.

Fiscal period is one year. Being a privately held company, we care more about IRS forms than GAAP. We're on 6.0 going to 8.0 as soon as it and we are ready. You would think that Epicor would address our business better since Vantage 8 and beyond is to support all of their various Manufacturing Packages. But Project Accounting and ETO Purchasing is still a pain in Vantage. We can, however, address some of the problems of ETO Purchasing with the new V8 Customization tools.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Holy GAAP, Batman! Based on responses (or lack thereof, really) to similar postings in the past, I didn't think anyone else was even interested in doing this strictly in Vantage!

I suspect most Vantage users faced with these issues are using Access, Excel and/or Crystal Reports (any or all with or without ODBC) to accomplish their accounting and then posting G/L adjusting entries accordingly. We have struggled with percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts for quite a while now. I can try to summarize what we have done here, but that must wait until next week. In the meantime, I have for you a few questions based on our experiences here. By "fiscal period", I presume you mean "one year". Is that right or are you referring to months or quarters? What criteria do you use to distinguish contracts subject to percentage-of-completion treatment from those that are not subject to it, e.g. do you use certain thresholds related to sales amounts or delivery times? Do you fully plan your jobs before production begins, so that you have a reasonably accurate estimated cost in your jobs? If not, can you rely on estimated costs you're your estimating/quoting process? Is your job cost tracking reliable? What version of Vantage are you using? Do you use VB forms and Report Builder?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Yahoo Vantage
Subject: [Vantage] Project Accounting

How are you handling jobs open through more than one fiscal period where recognizing revenue on a Cost % Complete basis with Over/Under Billings are an issue?

Have you heard if Vantage will ever support this type of work directly?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
How are you handling jobs open through more than one fiscal period where recognizing revenue on a Cost % Complete basis with Over/Under Billings are an issue?

Have you heard if Vantage will ever support this type of work directly?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Holy GAAP, Batman! Based on responses (or lack thereof, really) to similar
postings in the past, I didn't think anyone else was even interested in
doing this strictly in Vantage!



I suspect most Vantage users faced with these issues are using Access, Excel
and/or Crystal Reports (any or all with or without ODBC) to accomplish their
accounting and then posting G/L adjusting entries accordingly. We have
struggled with percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts
for quite a while now. I can try to summarize what we have done here, but
that must wait until next week. In the meantime, I have for you a few
questions based on our experiences here. By "fiscal period", I presume you
mean "one year". Is that right or are you referring to months or quarters?
What criteria do you use to distinguish contracts subject to
percentage-of-completion treatment from those that are not subject to it,
e.g. do you use certain thresholds related to sales amounts or delivery
times? Do you fully plan your jobs before production begins, so that you
have a reasonably accurate estimated cost in your jobs? If not, can you
rely on estimated costs you're your estimating/quoting process? Is your job
cost tracking reliable? What version of Vantage are you using? Do you use
VB forms and Report Builder?



Regards,
Scott Lepley
Systems Administrator
Mauell Corporation
Phone: 717-432-8686, ext. 14
Fax: 717-432-8688
Email: sal@...
Vantage version: 6.10.532



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Yahoo Vantage
Subject: [Vantage] Project Accounting



How are you handling jobs open through more than one fiscal period where
recognizing revenue on a Cost % Complete basis with Over/Under Billings are
an issue?

Have you heard if Vantage will ever support this type of work directly?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Electroimpact is strictly Engineer To Order (no Inventory) and 15-20 jobs at any one time require percentage-complete accounting which we do in Excel using Vantage data and then post back to Vantage manually. We use Miscellaneous Shipments, not Customer Shipments for these jobs, as we're shipping a unique machine, some assemble jet aircraft wings, in containers which are reassembled/tested by us at the customer site. Our estimated job costs are fairly accurate while our actual costs are accurate as we track all dollars and hours for everyone working on the job -- engineers, inspectors, machinists and technicians -- with true pay rates in Vantage. Overtime $ is automatically applied to the jobs through custom programming. Overhead is allocated based on labor $.

Fiscal period is one year. Being a privately held company, we care more about IRS forms than GAAP. We're on 6.0 going to 8.0 as soon as it and we are ready. You would think that Epicor would address our business better since Vantage 8 and beyond is to support all of their various Manufacturing Packages. But Project Accounting and ETO Purchasing is still a pain in Vantage. We can, however, address some of the problems of ETO Purchasing with the new V8 Customization tools.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting


Holy GAAP, Batman! Based on responses (or lack thereof, really) to similar postings in the past, I didn't think anyone else was even interested in doing this strictly in Vantage!

I suspect most Vantage users faced with these issues are using Access, Excel and/or Crystal Reports (any or all with or without ODBC) to accomplish their accounting and then posting G/L adjusting entries accordingly. We have struggled with percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts for quite a while now. I can try to summarize what we have done here, but that must wait until next week. In the meantime, I have for you a few questions based on our experiences here. By "fiscal period", I presume you mean "one year". Is that right or are you referring to months or quarters? What criteria do you use to distinguish contracts subject to percentage-of-completion treatment from those that are not subject to it, e.g. do you use certain thresholds related to sales amounts or delivery times? Do you fully plan your jobs before production begins, so that you have a reasonably accurate estimated cost in your jobs? If not, can you rely on estimated costs you're your estimating/quoting process? Is your job cost tracking reliable? What version of Vantage are you using? Do you use VB forms and Report Builder?

Regards,
Scott Lepley
Systems Administrator
Mauell Corporation
Phone: 717-432-8686, ext. 14
Fax: 717-432-8688
Email: sal@...
Vantage version: 6.10.532

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Yahoo Vantage
Subject: [Vantage] Project Accounting

How are you handling jobs open through more than one fiscal period where recognizing revenue on a Cost % Complete basis with Over/Under Billings are an issue?

Have you heard if Vantage will ever support this type of work directly?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hey Chris, just wanted to let you know that I haven't forgotten about this,
but I just haven't taken the time to summarize our process yet. Have you
received a reply from anyone else?



Regards,
Scott Lepley
Systems Administrator
Mauell Corporation
Phone: 717-432-8686, ext. 14
Fax: 717-432-8688
Email: sal@...
Vantage version: 6.10.532



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:10 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Project Accounting



Electroimpact is strictly Engineer To Order (no Inventory) and 15-20 jobs at
any one time require percentage-complete accounting which we do in Excel
using Vantage data and then post back to Vantage manually. We use
Miscellaneous Shipments, not Customer Shipments for these jobs, as we're
shipping a unique machine, some assemble jet aircraft wings, in containers
which are reassembled/tested by us at the customer site. Our estimated job
costs are fairly accurate while our actual costs are accurate as we track
all dollars and hours for everyone working on the job -- engineers,
inspectors, machinists and technicians -- with true pay rates in Vantage.
Overtime $ is automatically applied to the jobs through custom programming.
Overhead is allocated based on labor $.

Fiscal period is one year. Being a privately held company, we care more
about IRS forms than GAAP. We're on 6.0 going to 8.0 as soon as it and we
are ready. You would think that Epicor would address our business better
since Vantage 8 and beyond is to support all of their various Manufacturing
Packages. But Project Accounting and ETO Purchasing is still a pain in
Vantage. We can, however, address some of the problems of ETO Purchasing
with the new V8 Customization tools.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting


Holy GAAP, Batman! Based on responses (or lack thereof, really) to similar
postings in the past, I didn't think anyone else was even interested in
doing this strictly in Vantage!

I suspect most Vantage users faced with these issues are using Access, Excel
and/or Crystal Reports (any or all with or without ODBC) to accomplish their
accounting and then posting G/L adjusting entries accordingly. We have
struggled with percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts
for quite a while now. I can try to summarize what we have done here, but
that must wait until next week. In the meantime, I have for you a few
questions based on our experiences here. By "fiscal period", I presume you
mean "one year". Is that right or are you referring to months or quarters?
What criteria do you use to distinguish contracts subject to
percentage-of-completion treatment from those that are not subject to it,
e.g. do you use certain thresholds related to sales amounts or delivery
times? Do you fully plan your jobs before production begins, so that you
have a reasonably accurate estimated cost in your jobs? If not, can you
rely on estimated costs you're your estimating/quoting process? Is your job
cost tracking reliable? What version of Vantage are you using? Do you use
VB forms and Report Builder?

Regards,
Scott Lepley
Systems Administrator
Mauell Corporation
Phone: 717-432-8686, ext. 14
Fax: 717-432-8688
Email: sal@...
Vantage version: 6.10.532

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Yahoo Vantage
Subject: [Vantage] Project Accounting

How are you handling jobs open through more than one fiscal period where
recognizing revenue on a Cost % Complete basis with Over/Under Billings are
an issue?

Have you heard if Vantage will ever support this type of work directly?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
You're the only one, so far. One problem is the percentage complete revenue recognition, negotiated invoicing and over/under billings between the two. This we would like Vantage to be more helpful with.

Another is Engineer Purchasing for Engineer To Order, which we can mostly solve with V8 customization. But Vantage 8.0.805e still corrupts seven of our large jobs and PO contact phone numbers don't appear on the screen properly when using a Purchase Point. Purchasing is THE most important activity for engineers in Vantage and has to work and be friendly.

We can't go to V8 until its problems are resolved.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Hey Chris, just wanted to let you know that I haven't forgotten about this, but I just haven't taken the time to summarize our process yet. Have you received a reply from anyone else?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:10 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Electroimpact is strictly Engineer To Order (no Inventory) and 15-20 jobs at any one time require percentage-complete accounting which we do in Excel using Vantage data and then post back to Vantage manually. We use Miscellaneous Shipments, not Customer Shipments for these jobs, as we're shipping a unique machine, some assemble jet aircraft wings, in containers which are reassembled/tested by us at the customer site. Our estimated job costs are fairly accurate while our actual costs are accurate as we track all dollars and hours for everyone working on the job -- engineers, inspectors, machinists and technicians -- with true pay rates in Vantage. Overtime $ is automatically applied to the jobs through custom programming. Overhead is allocated based on labor $.

Fiscal period is one year. Being a privately held company, we care more about IRS forms than GAAP. We're on 6.0 going to 8.0 as soon as it and we are ready. You would think that Epicor would address our business better since Vantage 8 and beyond is to support all of their various Manufacturing Packages. But Project Accounting and ETO Purchasing is still a pain in Vantage. We can, however, address some of the problems of ETO Purchasing with the new V8 Customization tools.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Holy GAAP, Batman! Based on responses (or lack thereof, really) to similar postings in the past, I didn't think anyone else was even interested in doing this strictly in Vantage!

I suspect most Vantage users faced with these issues are using Access, Excel and/or Crystal Reports (any or all with or without ODBC) to accomplish their accounting and then posting G/L adjusting entries accordingly. We have struggled with percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts for quite a while now. I can try to summarize what we have done here, but that must wait until next week. In the meantime, I have for you a few questions based on our experiences here. By "fiscal period", I presume you mean "one year". Is that right or are you referring to months or quarters? What criteria do you use to distinguish contracts subject to percentage-of-completion treatment from those that are not subject to it, e.g. do you use certain thresholds related to sales amounts or delivery times? Do you fully plan your jobs before production begins, so that you have a reasonably accurate estimated cost in your jobs? If not, can you rely on estimated costs you're your estimating/quoting process? Is your job cost tracking reliable? What version of Vantage are you using? Do you use VB forms and Report Builder?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Yahoo Vantage
Subject: [Vantage] Project Accounting

How are you handling jobs open through more than one fiscal period where recognizing revenue on a Cost % Complete basis with Over/Under Billings are an issue?

Have you heard if Vantage will ever support this type of work directly?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hello Chris,



I apologize for the long delay in responding, but here's a brief summary of
what we have in place. More work remains, but at least we're moving in the
right direction now. At least I think we are...



I just uploaded a Report Builder report that calculates, for every open
make-to-order job linked to a sales order release flagged as subject to
percentage-of-completion accounting, the actual job costs-to-date, the
percentage-of-completion ratio and the resulting earned revenue-to-date. In
turn, it totals invoiced-to-date and compares that value to the earned
revenue-to-date to determine over- and under-billing. This report is,
without a doubt, the most complicated one that I have ever created in Report
Builder, so suffice it to say that there are probably better ways to do what
I have done in it and that Crystal Reports is probably much better suited to
the task. At some point, I will need to convert it from RB to CR.



The report is dependent upon the proper use of several user-defined fields,
some of which are set up in VB forms. In sales order releases, we have a VB
form where we designate a planner and whether the release is subject to PoC.
In the corresponding job headers, we use one of the check-off boxes
(JobHead.CheckOff2) to indicate that the job is 'ready for PoC' and one of
the user fields (JobHead.UserInteger1) to enter the estimated cost from our
quote. From there, everything else happens in the report. Again, there are
probably better ways to do this, but this is the outcome to date of my
trials and errors (of which there have been plenty). Our company president
would like to see some cash flow forecasting added to the report based on
anticipated milestone billings, so I still have that challenge ahead of me.
If you have any ideas, please share.



I hope this helps!



Regards,
Scott Lepley
Systems Administrator
Mauell Corporation
Phone: 717-432-8686, ext. 14
Fax: 717-432-8688
Email: sal@...
Vantage version: 6.10.532



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Project Accounting



You're the only one, so far. One problem is the percentage complete revenue
recognition, negotiated invoicing and over/under billings between the two.
This we would like Vantage to be more helpful with.

Another is Engineer Purchasing for Engineer To Order, which we can mostly
solve with V8 customization. But Vantage 8.0.805e still corrupts seven of
our large jobs and PO contact phone numbers don't appear on the screen
properly when using a Purchase Point. Purchasing is THE most important
activity for engineers in Vantage and has to work and be friendly.

We can't go to V8 until its problems are resolved.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Hey Chris, just wanted to let you know that I haven't forgotten about this,
but I just haven't taken the time to summarize our process yet. Have you
received a reply from anyone else?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:10 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Electroimpact is strictly Engineer To Order (no Inventory) and 15-20 jobs at
any one time require percentage-complete accounting which we do in Excel
using Vantage data and then post back to Vantage manually. We use
Miscellaneous Shipments, not Customer Shipments for these jobs, as we're
shipping a unique machine, some assemble jet aircraft wings, in containers
which are reassembled/tested by us at the customer site. Our estimated job
costs are fairly accurate while our actual costs are accurate as we track
all dollars and hours for everyone working on the job -- engineers,
inspectors, machinists and technicians -- with true pay rates in Vantage.
Overtime $ is automatically applied to the jobs through custom programming.
Overhead is allocated based on labor $.

Fiscal period is one year. Being a privately held company, we care more
about IRS forms than GAAP. We're on 6.0 going to 8.0 as soon as it and we
are ready. You would think that Epicor would address our business better
since Vantage 8 and beyond is to support all of their various Manufacturing
Packages. But Project Accounting and ETO Purchasing is still a pain in
Vantage. We can, however, address some of the problems of ETO Purchasing
with the new V8 Customization tools.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting

Holy GAAP, Batman! Based on responses (or lack thereof, really) to similar
postings in the past, I didn't think anyone else was even interested in
doing this strictly in Vantage!

I suspect most Vantage users faced with these issues are using Access, Excel
and/or Crystal Reports (any or all with or without ODBC) to accomplish their
accounting and then posting G/L adjusting entries accordingly. We have
struggled with percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts
for quite a while now. I can try to summarize what we have done here, but
that must wait until next week. In the meantime, I have for you a few
questions based on our experiences here. By "fiscal period", I presume you
mean "one year". Is that right or are you referring to months or quarters?
What criteria do you use to distinguish contracts subject to
percentage-of-completion treatment from those that are not subject to it,
e.g. do you use certain thresholds related to sales amounts or delivery
times? Do you fully plan your jobs before production begins, so that you
have a reasonably accurate estimated cost in your jobs? If not, can you
rely on estimated costs you're your estimating/quoting process? Is your job
cost tracking reliable? What version of Vantage are you using? Do you use
VB forms and Report Builder?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Yahoo Vantage
Subject: [Vantage] Project Accounting

How are you handling jobs open through more than one fiscal period where
recognizing revenue on a Cost % Complete basis with Over/Under Billings are
an issue?

Have you heard if Vantage will ever support this type of work directly?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Well,

Wow... I have been looking at your posts from afar. Would it be fair
to say that vantage doesn't really embrace project type work? I
understand that 'projects' was tagged on to the system but it would
be great just to post a misc invoice(ap) to a project. But we are
not using projects to generate wip then cos then invoice etc.



--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Chris,
>
>
>
> I apologize for the long delay in responding, but here's a brief
summary of
> what we have in place. More work remains, but at least we're
moving in the
> right direction now. At least I think we are...
>
>
>
> I just uploaded a Report Builder report that calculates, for every
open
> make-to-order job linked to a sales order release flagged as
subject to
> percentage-of-completion accounting, the actual job costs-to-date,
the
> percentage-of-completion ratio and the resulting earned revenue-to-
date. In
> turn, it totals invoiced-to-date and compares that value to the
earned
> revenue-to-date to determine over- and under-billing. This report
is,
> without a doubt, the most complicated one that I have ever created
in Report
> Builder, so suffice it to say that there are probably better ways
to do what
> I have done in it and that Crystal Reports is probably much better
suited to
> the task. At some point, I will need to convert it from RB to CR.
>
>
>
> The report is dependent upon the proper use of several user-defined
fields,
> some of which are set up in VB forms. In sales order releases, we
have a VB
> form where we designate a planner and whether the release is
subject to PoC.
> In the corresponding job headers, we use one of the check-off boxes
> (JobHead.CheckOff2) to indicate that the job is 'ready for PoC' and
one of
> the user fields (JobHead.UserInteger1) to enter the estimated cost
from our
> quote. From there, everything else happens in the report. Again,
there are
> probably better ways to do this, but this is the outcome to date of
my
> trials and errors (of which there have been plenty). Our company
president
> would like to see some cash flow forecasting added to the report
based on
> anticipated milestone billings, so I still have that challenge
ahead of me.
> If you have any ideas, please share.
>
>
>
> I hope this helps!
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Scott Lepley
> Systems Administrator
> Mauell Corporation
> Phone: 717-432-8686, ext. 14
> Fax: 717-432-8688
> Email: sal@...
> Vantage version: 6.10.532
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:41 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Project Accounting
>
>
>
> You're the only one, so far. One problem is the percentage complete
revenue
> recognition, negotiated invoicing and over/under billings between
the two.
> This we would like Vantage to be more helpful with.
>
> Another is Engineer Purchasing for Engineer To Order, which we can
mostly
> solve with V8 customization. But Vantage 8.0.805e still corrupts
seven of
> our large jobs and PO contact phone numbers don't appear on the
screen
> properly when using a Purchase Point. Purchasing is THE most
important
> activity for engineers in Vantage and has to work and be friendly.
>
> We can't go to V8 until its problems are resolved.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
> To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:11 AM
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting
>
> Hey Chris, just wanted to let you know that I haven't forgotten
about this,
> but I just haven't taken the time to summarize our process yet.
Have you
> received a reply from anyone else?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:10 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Project Accounting
>
> Electroimpact is strictly Engineer To Order (no Inventory) and 15-
20 jobs at
> any one time require percentage-complete accounting which we do in
Excel
> using Vantage data and then post back to Vantage manually. We use
> Miscellaneous Shipments, not Customer Shipments for these jobs, as
we're
> shipping a unique machine, some assemble jet aircraft wings, in
containers
> which are reassembled/tested by us at the customer site. Our
estimated job
> costs are fairly accurate while our actual costs are accurate as we
track
> all dollars and hours for everyone working on the job -- engineers,
> inspectors, machinists and technicians -- with true pay rates in
Vantage.
> Overtime $ is automatically applied to the jobs through custom
programming.
> Overhead is allocated based on labor $.
>
> Fiscal period is one year. Being a privately held company, we care
more
> about IRS forms than GAAP. We're on 6.0 going to 8.0 as soon as it
and we
> are ready. You would think that Epicor would address our business
better
> since Vantage 8 and beyond is to support all of their various
Manufacturing
> Packages. But Project Accounting and ETO Purchasing is still a pain
in
> Vantage. We can, however, address some of the problems of ETO
Purchasing
> with the new V8 Customization tools.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lepley, Scott A." <sal@...>
> To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:10 PM
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Project Accounting
>
> Holy GAAP, Batman! Based on responses (or lack thereof, really) to
similar
> postings in the past, I didn't think anyone else was even
interested in
> doing this strictly in Vantage!
>
> I suspect most Vantage users faced with these issues are using
Access, Excel
> and/or Crystal Reports (any or all with or without ODBC) to
accomplish their
> accounting and then posting G/L adjusting entries accordingly. We
have
> struggled with percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term
contracts
> for quite a while now. I can try to summarize what we have done
here, but
> that must wait until next week. In the meantime, I have for you a
few
> questions based on our experiences here. By "fiscal period", I
presume you
> mean "one year". Is that right or are you referring to months or
quarters?
> What criteria do you use to distinguish contracts subject to
> percentage-of-completion treatment from those that are not subject
to it,
> e.g. do you use certain thresholds related to sales amounts or
delivery
> times? Do you fully plan your jobs before production begins, so
that you
> have a reasonably accurate estimated cost in your jobs? If not,
can you
> rely on estimated costs you're your estimating/quoting process? Is
your job
> cost tracking reliable? What version of Vantage are you using? Do
you use
> VB forms and Report Builder?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Robisch [mailto:blue.wine@...]
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:15 PM
> To: Yahoo Vantage
> Subject: [Vantage] Project Accounting
>
> How are you handling jobs open through more than one fiscal period
where
> recognizing revenue on a Cost % Complete basis with Over/Under
Billings are
> an issue?
>
> Have you heard if Vantage will ever support this type of work
directly?
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>