I am not sure it will solve our issue , but at least it’s another thing we can remove from the equation.
1 Like
For sure, thanks for following up.
Hi, I put an update on another similar thread, but just to let you know. We upgraded to 10.2.700.25 three weeks ago and this included the fix PRB0236114 (actually included in the .24 release).
I ran the Refresh Part Quantities and Allocation process after the upgrade and have run it regularly since and only had one suggested correction. and this was explained by the material having an incorrect UOM used in the job.