Time Phase Report in 8.03.405a

Yahoo Archive
1
Charles;

There is a documented fix on 405A
ľ Time Phased Mtl Requirements - Time Phase Report ignores the date
specified in the field "Ignore If not needed by"

I know this may come as a surprise, but maybe in the mode of fixing
something, Epicor broke other logic with Time Phase. Plus, on the
Change List, it was up under Job Management.

I don't know if this helps any...but I thought it might be helpful to
know they "fixed" this report.
Thanks
Patty Buechler

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Charles Carden <ccarden@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone noticed the difference in the Time Phase Material Report
in version 8.03.405a compared to version.8.03.403d? I am in the
process of testing 4.05 and ran the report for exceptions only with a
cutoff date of 08/31/2008. Version 8.03.403d prints 13 pages and
version 8.03.405a prints 253 pages. The data is static in both
versions. I am trying to analyze which report is incorrect but
thought I could save some time if anyone else has discovered this.
>
> Charles Carden
> IT Manager
> Manitex, Inc.
> +1 (512) 942-3086
>
>
> ________________________________
> DISCLAIMER:
> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this
e-mail immediately.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
2
Has anyone noticed the difference in the Time Phase Material Report in version 8.03.405a compared to version.8.03.403d? I am in the process of testing 4.05 and ran the report for exceptions only with a cutoff date of 08/31/2008. Version 8.03.403d prints 13 pages and version 8.03.405a prints 253 pages. The data is static in both versions. I am trying to analyze which report is incorrect but thought I could save some time if anyone else has discovered this.

Charles Carden
IT Manager
Manitex, Inc.
+1 (512) 942-3086


________________________________
DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]