Ugh -> Bug Grid - Provider Model - Date Fields

Ok, I have a dataview for a BAQ. Got the grid setup via guided setup.

Trying to use the provider model for easier refresh. (I’m using pub/sub)

The field I am trying to update is a date field. It will not even show the datetime editor.

It works fine for text fields.

If I don’t set a BAQ in the provider model, and populate the dv manually, the editor shows up and works fine.

I’m assuming this is a bug with no workaround, but throwing it out there.

1 Like

Have you tried defining the editor model directly?

Go to your grid and go Grid Model > Columns and on your column set the ERP Editor Model to datetime

Yes, no change.

1 Like

Was gonna suggest the same per:

The plot thickens. Added a Calculated DateTime Field and it works correctly.

2 Likes

What The Hell Just Happened Reaction GIF

1 Like

Weird, I just tried to create a quick dashboard with a uBAQ that updated OrderRel.ReqDate using standard BO update and it worked fine.

Shrugs GIF

Same, created a simple Ubaq to update startdate on jobhead. the editor shows the datepicker.

Is the common editor selected in the advanced column editor configuration of the BAQ?

1 Like

Also, try collapsing the panel and reexpanding it? I have had this problem before with it not loading a dropdown initally when it launches… no satisfactory solution so far.

1 Like

At first I didn’t get the question as I still mostly use Classic BAQ. But I checked it in Kinetic and it’s set to Date Picker which must be default as it’s called “Common Editor” in Classic.

1 Like

Yes.

nope

This only occurs if I let the provider model refresh the baq.
What’s weird, a calculated datetime or date works fine.

I inspected the json, and didn’t see anything weird.

2 Likes

I just made a new one, super simple and it worked.
WTF.

5 Likes

New what? New Grid? New BAQ? New Dashboard?

New baq, new db

2 Likes

Pretty standard application studio

4 Likes

Curious what Format value in GetQueryResultSetMetadataByID response just before ExecuteBaq request. Wonder whether there was a diff between date field and calculated date field.

Seems likley from where default column types are inferred.

:man_shrugging:

{date} in the one that works and the one that doesn’t.

Same for the calculated field that works regardless.

1 Like

More weirdness. The field I was using, was brought up from a subquery.

If I linked and got a field from an actual table, it worked again.

What a POS.

2 Likes

Column inheritance is quite a mess. Hoping they go back to the drawing board on the grid component.

1 Like

That wish applies to so much of Kinetic.

2 Likes