When the cost roll was completed, the "consider pull as assembly" flag
was checked. We have tried to roll up both ways and we cannot see any
difference in the cost roll or the transactions. We have our job
engineered with sub-assemblies in the revision. Currently we are using
the "Issue Assembly" to issue to WIP. As I stated earlier, when we
issue, the material and material burden cost appear on the wip report
and not the labor or labor burden. We are using the std costing method
and we assumed that the issue transactions would be based on the std
cost breakdown. This is not what we are seeing.
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mark Wonsil
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:14 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] V8 Labor Not Moving
the
Pull as Assembly flag"? This treats lower level labor and burden as
material
in the higher level part. A view costs will show you this.
Just to be clear, when you say "Sub Assembly", do you mean a make part
or a
true subassembly? (ASM > 0)
Mark W.
This is an e-mail from Saab Barracuda LLC. It is for the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and privileged information. No one else may read, print, store, copy, forward or act in reliance on it or its attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this message to the sender and delete the message and any attachments from your computer. Your cooperation is appreciated.
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
was checked. We have tried to roll up both ways and we cannot see any
difference in the cost roll or the transactions. We have our job
engineered with sub-assemblies in the revision. Currently we are using
the "Issue Assembly" to issue to WIP. As I stated earlier, when we
issue, the material and material burden cost appear on the wip report
and not the labor or labor burden. We are using the std costing method
and we assumed that the issue transactions would be based on the std
cost breakdown. This is not what we are seeing.
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mark Wonsil
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:14 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] V8 Labor Not Moving
> What would cause material and material burden to go into wip whenissued
> and not the labor and labor burden for a sub-assembly.When you rolled the costs up for that part, did you check the "Consider
the
Pull as Assembly flag"? This treats lower level labor and burden as
material
in the higher level part. A view costs will show you this.
Just to be clear, when you say "Sub Assembly", do you mean a make part
or a
true subassembly? (ASM > 0)
Mark W.
This is an e-mail from Saab Barracuda LLC. It is for the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and privileged information. No one else may read, print, store, copy, forward or act in reliance on it or its attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this message to the sender and delete the message and any attachments from your computer. Your cooperation is appreciated.
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]