Todd,
Could you explain in greater detail how the XPP machines and the thin
clients were configured? Or, perhaps you have a book, article, or
advertisement which you could reference?
I like the sound of this approach and am considering implementing it
here.
-Daniel Toffolo
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "todd Anderson" <todd.anderson@s...>
wrote:
Could you explain in greater detail how the XPP machines and the thin
clients were configured? Or, perhaps you have a book, article, or
advertisement which you could reference?
I like the sound of this approach and am considering implementing it
here.
-Daniel Toffolo
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "todd Anderson" <todd.anderson@s...>
wrote:
> Charles,coming off
>
> A few months back I purchased 7 PC's from Dell Financial Services
> of lease with XP-Pro installed.Small form
>
> On average P1500-P2000 with 512-1000 meg of RAM. These were all
> factor Dell GX240's.There
>
> I setup them up with the normal desktop programs plus Vantage etc.
> are a few trick settings you have to watch out for.just
>
> Once loaded and configured I stacked them up in my server room with
> power cords and network cables. I did have 1monitor/keyboard/mouse sitting
> next to the stack that I could plug into any of the 7 PCs if I hadto tweak
> them.I wanted
>
> Remotes were HP thin clients running CE-net.
>
> Price tag?
>
> 7 PCs with an average price of $ 300 - delivered.
> 7 Thin clients with an average price of $ 350 delivered.
>
> So for $ 4,550 I had 7 thin clients that I could configure any way
> without running into weird MS licensing issues or Terminal Serverissues.
> About $ 650 per user which is less then the cost of a new PC.others
>
> Over time I could upgrade any of the PCs as required while letting
> just get -old-.Vantage dropped
>
> For remote sites linking over partial T-1's startup time for
> from 4-5 minutes to 8-10 seconds. They were shocked at the speedincrease
> and I no longer had issues with how to support PCs that were 300miles away.
>this ...
> Mind you - it took me 3 years to get management to even let me try
>sense.
> I'm sure there is some point where Terminal Services makes economic
> I'm just not sure where that line is.floor
>
> This is also an excellent solution to getting PCs out of nasty shop
> situations. The thin clients have no fans or moving parts so theyare
> fairly immune to bad environments.Behalf Of
>
> Todd Anderson
> Anderson Computer Services
>
> _____
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
> Charles Paluska - HPNrack of XP
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:53 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Vantage 8 Terminal Server Requirements
>
>
> I'm beginning to think it might be cheaper/better to just have a
> Pro's running remote desktop and round robin DNS.provide
>
> Charles
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Wojewoda" <twojewoda@p...>
> To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:25 PM
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 8 Terminal Server Requirements
>
>
> > ?
> > Don't worry, I'm sure Epicor has an addisional service that will
> you with a server for a great discounted price of 200% of it shelfprice.
> >12 gig of
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com on behalf of todd Anderson
> > Sent: Thu 8/18/2005 4:20 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 8 Terminal Server Requirements
> >
> >
> >
> > Just out of curiosity - how much does it cost for a server with
> > RAM these days?Behalf
> >
> > I'm guessing we are talking multiple processors?
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
> Ofone
> > Chris Robisch
> > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:01 PM
> > To: Yahoo Vantage
> > Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 8 Terminal Server Requirements
> >
> >
> > Have received advice from Epicor to not put more than 22 users on
> > Terminal Server and it should have 12gig RAM for those 22 users.
> >
> > What are the recommendations from those running v8 live?
> >
> > How many using TS? not using TS? happy?
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >