WIP report Blank Title 65451

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job - this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.



WIP - is the dollars remaining.



If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report





Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report



C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job - this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No, if you build to stock, the negative is a result of the actual cost being lower than the cost method of inventory.

Deirdre

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Lori Buck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report



Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job - this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thank you, everyone, for the feedback and help!



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Deirdre Sykes
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:43 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report





No, if you build to stock, the negative is a result of the actual cost
being lower than the cost method of inventory.

Deirdre

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Lori Buck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship
from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job -
this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message,
including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission
to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication or use of the information contained herein is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail
transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying
or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our
address record can be corrected.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi,

We have had to put in a cutoff date of the 31/8/2013 due to issues we have had running MRP:
Currently we have:

7360 unfirm jobs created in our system
Firm 964
Released 581.

Regards,

Ross

Sent from my iPad

On 20 Feb 2013, at 19:36, Marco Vissuet <mvissuet@...> wrote:

> How many MRP jobs do you have?
>
> Marco Vissuet
> Systems Engineer
> Pacific Contours Corporation
> Anaheim Office (714) 693-1260
> San Diego Office (619)670-3900
> Fax (714) 693-1252
> mvissuet@...@...>
> http://www.pacificcontours.com/
>
> "The information contained herein may be subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) Warning: - This document contains data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et seq.) as amended, or the Export Administration Act (Title 50, U.S.C., App 2401 et seq.) as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal and civil penalties. Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DoD Directive 5230.25.
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ross Robertson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:06 AM
> To: Vantage Group
> Subject: [Vantage] MRP process
>
> Dear all,
>
> I hope that someone is able to help. We have been experiencing issues with the run time for our MRP system. We are on vantage version 8.03.408B running on a progress database.
>
> I wanted to ask other users in the group how often they run a full MRP and what horizon they use? I know that different companies will require different settings but our planning department are determined to run a full MRP regenerative every night with no cut off date.
>
> We also use the following settings:
>
> Ignore constrained materials
> Allow historical dates
> Run the multi level pegging process.
>
> The issue that we are having is the length of time it takes to delete the unfirm jobs in the system and we have been now experiencing MRP taking an extremely long time to complete.
> For example we have tried to cut the horizon down to the 31/10/2013 and have started this process off at 20:00 at night and on several occasions this has taken until lunchtime the next day to complete?
>
> I have logged this with Epicor and they have asked us to run the following conversion routines:
> 5640
> 5100
> 6430
>
> We also done a dump and load last year? Any ideas would be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ross
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi,

Thanks for that. I will contact you with some questions.

Thanks for your help.

Cheers,

Ross

Sent from my iPad

On 20 Feb 2013, at 19:29, "Michael Brown" <mbrown@...> wrote:

>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Ross Robertson wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I hope that someone is able to help. We have been experiencing issues with the run time for our MRP system. We are on vantage version 8.03.408B running on a progress database.
> >
> > I wanted to ask other users in the group how often they run a full MRP and what horizon they use? I know that different companies will require different settings but our planning department are determined to run a full MRP regenerative every night with no cut off date.
> >
> > We also use the following settings:
> >
> > Ignore constrained materials
> > Allow historical dates
> > Run the multi level pegging process.
> >
> > The issue that we are having is the length of time it takes to delete the unfirm jobs in the system and we have been now experiencing MRP taking an extremely long time to complete.
> > For example we have tried to cut the horizon down to the 31/10/2013 and have started this process off at 20:00 at night and on several occasions this has taken until lunchtime the next day to complete?
> >
> > I have logged this with Epicor and they have asked us to run the following conversion routines:
> > 5640
> > 5100
> > 6430
> >
> > We also done a dump and load last year? Any ideas would be appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ross
> >
> Ross,
> Why would you not want a cutoff date? Are you within a horizon that determines that for you? Allowing Historical Dates is a monster in its own! If it's late, it's late!
> We run regenerative every week and I can help you out with some of this. I am a Master Scheduler and know the ins and outs of MRP in 803.
> Send me an email to mbrown@... and I will shed some light for you.
> Thanks
> Mike
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi,

I have been having a look at the MRP regen log and the multi level pegging only took from 06:14 until 06:28. I will upload the log.

I am going to try changing the number of processors and number of schedules as we are currently running 1 and 1.

Regards,

Ross


Sent from my iPad

On 20 Feb 2013, at 21:03, "Len Hartka" <len.hartka@...> wrote:

> Good Day:
>
> In your version, can you run it without "Multi-level
> pegging". That doubles the time and I never did get an answer to if it
> is needed.
>
> Run Regen every night at 10: PM -- in 8 hours ( 4 if no
> pegging) - run 6 processors and 6 Schedulers -
>
> Sun is on E9 Verion: 9.05.700C - SQL- Unidata - Enterprise-since
> 4/15/2012
>
> Went live on 9.05.600B on 11/22/2010
>
> Previously used M2K ( Manage 2000, ver 7.0 SP5) from 7/4/2001
>
> Previously used INMASS
>
> Len
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Michael Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:29 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: MRP process
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , Ross
> Robertson wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I hope that someone is able to help. We have been experiencing issues
> with the run time for our MRP system. We are on vantage version
> 8.03.408B running on a progress database.
> >
> > I wanted to ask other users in the group how often they run a full MRP
> and what horizon they use? I know that different companies will require
> different settings but our planning department are determined to run a
> full MRP regenerative every night with no cut off date.
> >
> > We also use the following settings:
> >
> > Ignore constrained materials
> > Allow historical dates
> > Run the multi level pegging process.
> >
> > The issue that we are having is the length of time it takes to delete
> the unfirm jobs in the system and we have been now experiencing MRP
> taking an extremely long time to complete.
> > For example we have tried to cut the horizon down to the 31/10/2013
> and have started this process off at 20:00 at night and on several
> occasions this has taken until lunchtime the next day to complete?
> >
> > I have logged this with Epicor and they have asked us to run the
> following conversion routines:
> > 5640
> > 5100
> > 6430
> >
> > We also done a dump and load last year? Any ideas would be
> appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ross
> >
> Ross,
> Why would you not want a cutoff date? Are you within a horizon that
> determines that for you? Allowing Historical Dates is a monster in its
> own! If it's late, it's late!
> We run regenerative every week and I can help you out with some of this.
> I am a Master Scheduler and know the ins and outs of MRP in 803.
> Send me an email to mbrown@... and I
> will shed some light for you.
> Thanks
> Mike
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi,

I have attached the log from last night with the cut down horizon:

Thursday February 21 19:59:03 2013

19:59:03 MRP regeneration process begin.
19:59:03 PID: 7396; Session: 192.9.200.22::MfgSys803Print::8304::12ed18baab96725d:fa7e74:13cf3635857:-7563
19:59:03 MRP Account Synchronisation Begins...
19:59:03 Verifying MRP account setup.
19:59:05 Stopping MRP account.
19:59:16 Backing up current database.
20:15:44 Restoring database to MRP account.
20:38:17 Configuring MRP account.
20:46:32 Starting MRP account and submitting MRP Process.
20:47:36 MRP Account Synchronisation Ends...
20:47:36 Generating plant list.
20:47:36 Starting sub-processes
20:47:36 Deleting unfirm jobs ...
01:34:44 Scheduling jobs ...
01:34:45 Building PartList Level: 0
03:39:11 Building PartList Level: 1
04:22:46 Building PartList Level: 2
04:50:30 Building PartList Level: 3
05:38:05 Building PartList Level: 4
05:53:33 Building PartList Level: 5
05:56:06 Building PartList Level: 6
05:56:53 Building PartList Level: 7
05:57:09 Building PartList Level: 8
05:57:21 Building PartList Level: 9
05:57:32 Building PartList Level: 10
05:57:38 Building PartList Level: 11
05:57:49 Building Non-Part List
06:14:29 disconnect Mrp Process 001
06:14:29 disconnect Mrp Process 101
06:14:39 Processing Orphan PO's...
06:14:39 Processing Orphan PO:311911 Line:1 Rel:1.
06:14:39 Processing Orphan PO:311967 Line:2 Rel:1.
06:14:39 Starting Mutli Level Pegging...
06:28:25 MRP regeneration process finished.

Regards,

Ross

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Ross Robertson <ross_robertson@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been having a look at the MRP regen log and the multi level pegging only took from 06:14 until 06:28. I will upload the log.
>
> I am going to try changing the number of processors and number of schedules as we are currently running 1 and 1.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ross
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 20 Feb 2013, at 21:03, "Len Hartka" <len.hartka@...> wrote:
>
> > Good Day:
> >
> > In your version, can you run it without "Multi-level
> > pegging". That doubles the time and I never did get an answer to if it
> > is needed.
> >
> > Run Regen every night at 10: PM -- in 8 hours ( 4 if no
> > pegging) - run 6 processors and 6 Schedulers -
> >
> > Sun is on E9 Verion: 9.05.700C - SQL- Unidata - Enterprise-since
> > 4/15/2012
> >
> > Went live on 9.05.600B on 11/22/2010
> >
> > Previously used M2K ( Manage 2000, ver 7.0 SP5) from 7/4/2001
> >
> > Previously used INMASS
> >
> > Len
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of Michael Brown
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:29 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: MRP process
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , Ross
> > Robertson wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I hope that someone is able to help. We have been experiencing issues
> > with the run time for our MRP system. We are on vantage version
> > 8.03.408B running on a progress database.
> > >
> > > I wanted to ask other users in the group how often they run a full MRP
> > and what horizon they use? I know that different companies will require
> > different settings but our planning department are determined to run a
> > full MRP regenerative every night with no cut off date.
> > >
> > > We also use the following settings:
> > >
> > > Ignore constrained materials
> > > Allow historical dates
> > > Run the multi level pegging process.
> > >
> > > The issue that we are having is the length of time it takes to delete
> > the unfirm jobs in the system and we have been now experiencing MRP
> > taking an extremely long time to complete.
> > > For example we have tried to cut the horizon down to the 31/10/2013
> > and have started this process off at 20:00 at night and on several
> > occasions this has taken until lunchtime the next day to complete?
> > >
> > > I have logged this with Epicor and they have asked us to run the
> > following conversion routines:
> > > 5640
> > > 5100
> > > 6430
> > >
> > > We also done a dump and load last year? Any ideas would be
> > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ross
> > >
> > Ross,
> > Why would you not want a cutoff date? Are you within a horizon that
> > determines that for you? Allowing Historical Dates is a monster in its
> > own! If it's late, it's late!
> > We run regenerative every week and I can help you out with some of this.
> > I am a Master Scheduler and know the ins and outs of MRP in 803.
> > Send me an email to mbrown@... and I
> > will shed some light for you.
> > Thanks
> > Mike
> >
> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Good Day Ross:



We have tested it several times and PEGGING always
almost doubles the time.

You might try running it without pegging. Sometimes log
data can measure the wrong thing.






Len



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of ross_robertson@...
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:12 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: MRP process





Hi,

I have attached the log from last night with the cut down horizon:

Thursday February 21 19:59:03 2013

19:59:03 MRP regeneration process begin.
19:59:03 PID: 7396; Session:
192.9.200.22::MfgSys803Print::8304::12ed18baab96725d:fa7e74:13cf3635857:
-7563
19:59:03 MRP Account Synchronisation Begins...
19:59:03 Verifying MRP account setup.
19:59:05 Stopping MRP account.
19:59:16 Backing up current database.
20:15:44 Restoring database to MRP account.
20:38:17 Configuring MRP account.
20:46:32 Starting MRP account and submitting MRP Process.
20:47:36 MRP Account Synchronisation Ends...
20:47:36 Generating plant list.
20:47:36 Starting sub-processes
20:47:36 Deleting unfirm jobs ...
01:34:44 Scheduling jobs ...
01:34:45 Building PartList Level: 0
03:39:11 Building PartList Level: 1
04:22:46 Building PartList Level: 2
04:50:30 Building PartList Level: 3
05:38:05 Building PartList Level: 4
05:53:33 Building PartList Level: 5
05:56:06 Building PartList Level: 6
05:56:53 Building PartList Level: 7
05:57:09 Building PartList Level: 8
05:57:21 Building PartList Level: 9
05:57:32 Building PartList Level: 10
05:57:38 Building PartList Level: 11
05:57:49 Building Non-Part List
06:14:29 disconnect Mrp Process 001
06:14:29 disconnect Mrp Process 101
06:14:39 Processing Orphan PO's...
06:14:39 Processing Orphan PO:311911 Line:1 Rel:1.
06:14:39 Processing Orphan PO:311967 Line:2 Rel:1.
06:14:39 Starting Mutli Level Pegging...
06:28:25 MRP regeneration process finished.

Regards,

Ross

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Ross
Robertson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been having a look at the MRP regen log and the multi level
pegging only took from 06:14 until 06:28. I will upload the log.
>
> I am going to try changing the number of processors and number of
schedules as we are currently running 1 and 1.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ross
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 20 Feb 2013, at 21:03, "Len Hartka" wrote:
>
> > Good Day:
> >
> > In your version, can you run it without "Multi-level
> > pegging". That doubles the time and I never did get an answer to if
it
> > is needed.
> >
> > Run Regen every night at 10: PM -- in 8 hours ( 4 if no
> > pegging) - run 6 processors and 6 Schedulers -
> >
> > Sun is on E9 Verion: 9.05.700C - SQL- Unidata - Enterprise-since
> > 4/15/2012
> >
> > Went live on 9.05.600B on 11/22/2010
> >
> > Previously used M2K ( Manage 2000, ver 7.0 SP5) from 7/4/2001
> >
> > Previously used INMASS
> >
> > Len
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
> > Of Michael Brown
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:29 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: MRP process
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
Ross
> > Robertson wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I hope that someone is able to help. We have been experiencing
issues
> > with the run time for our MRP system. We are on vantage version
> > 8.03.408B running on a progress database.
> > >
> > > I wanted to ask other users in the group how often they run a full
MRP
> > and what horizon they use? I know that different companies will
require
> > different settings but our planning department are determined to run
a
> > full MRP regenerative every night with no cut off date.
> > >
> > > We also use the following settings:
> > >
> > > Ignore constrained materials
> > > Allow historical dates
> > > Run the multi level pegging process.
> > >
> > > The issue that we are having is the length of time it takes to
delete
> > the unfirm jobs in the system and we have been now experiencing MRP
> > taking an extremely long time to complete.
> > > For example we have tried to cut the horizon down to the
31/10/2013
> > and have started this process off at 20:00 at night and on several
> > occasions this has taken until lunchtime the next day to complete?
> > >
> > > I have logged this with Epicor and they have asked us to run the
> > following conversion routines:
> > > 5640
> > > 5100
> > > 6430
> > >
> > > We also done a dump and load last year? Any ideas would be
> > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ross
> > >
> > Ross,
> > Why would you not want a cutoff date? Are you within a horizon that
> > determines that for you? Allowing Historical Dates is a monster in
its
> > own! If it's late, it's late!
> > We run regenerative every week and I can help you out with some of
this.
> > I am a Master Scheduler and know the ins and outs of MRP in 803.
> > Send me an email to mbrown@... and I
> > will shed some light for you.
> > Thanks
> > Mike
> >
> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and
then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this
message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged
to protect against viruses.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Good Day Ross:



Going from 1 to 5-6 processors should make a HUGE difference.



Len



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ross Robertson
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:07 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: MRP process





Hi,

I have been having a look at the MRP regen log and the multi level pegging only took from 06:14 until 06:28. I will upload the log.

I am going to try changing the number of processors and number of schedules as we are currently running 1 and 1.

Regards,

Ross

Sent from my iPad

On 20 Feb 2013, at 21:03, "Len Hartka" len.hartka@... <mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com> > wrote:

> Good Day:
>
> In your version, can you run it without "Multi-level
> pegging". That doubles the time and I never did get an answer to if it
> is needed.
>
> Run Regen every night at 10: PM -- in 8 hours ( 4 if no
> pegging) - run 6 processors and 6 Schedulers -
>
> Sun is on E9 Verion: 9.05.700C - SQL- Unidata - Enterprise-since
> 4/15/2012
>
> Went live on 9.05.600B on 11/22/2010
>
> Previously used M2K ( Manage 2000, ver 7.0 SP5) from 7/4/2001
>
> Previously used INMASS
>
> Len
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
> Of Michael Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:29 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: MRP process
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Ross
> Robertson wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I hope that someone is able to help. We have been experiencing issues
> with the run time for our MRP system. We are on vantage version
> 8.03.408B running on a progress database.
> >
> > I wanted to ask other users in the group how often they run a full MRP
> and what horizon they use? I know that different companies will require
> different settings but our planning department are determined to run a
> full MRP regenerative every night with no cut off date.
> >
> > We also use the following settings:
> >
> > Ignore constrained materials
> > Allow historical dates
> > Run the multi level pegging process.
> >
> > The issue that we are having is the length of time it takes to delete
> the unfirm jobs in the system and we have been now experiencing MRP
> taking an extremely long time to complete.
> > For example we have tried to cut the horizon down to the 31/10/2013
> and have started this process off at 20:00 at night and on several
> occasions this has taken until lunchtime the next day to complete?
> >
> > I have logged this with Epicor and they have asked us to run the
> following conversion routines:
> > 5640
> > 5100
> > 6430
> >
> > We also done a dump and load last year? Any ideas would be
> appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ross
> >
> Ross,
> Why would you not want a cutoff date? Are you within a horizon that
> determines that for you? Allowing Historical Dates is a monster in its
> own! If it's late, it's late!
> We run regenerative every week and I can help you out with some of this.
> I am a Master Scheduler and know the ins and outs of MRP in 803.
> Send me an email to mbrown@... <mailto:mbrown%40dsmfg.com> and I
> will shed some light for you.
> Thanks
> Mike
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Query: What is the best way to remove the negative? (Again, using
Vantage 9.05.700C) -



Thanks!



Ree



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Deirdre Sykes
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:43 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report





No, if you build to stock, the negative is a result of the actual cost
being lower than the cost method of inventory.

Deirdre

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Lori Buck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship
from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job -
this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message,
including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission
to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication or use of the information contained herein is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail
transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying
or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our
address record can be corrected.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What costing method are you using?



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:08 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report





Query: What is the best way to remove the negative? (Again, using
Vantage 9.05.700C) -

Thanks!

Ree

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Deirdre Sykes
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:43 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

No, if you build to stock, the negative is a result of the actual cost
being lower than the cost method of inventory.

Deirdre

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Lori Buck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship
from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job -
this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message,
including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission
to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication or use of the information contained herein is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail
transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying
or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our
address record can be corrected.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This is a resend. Any help appreciated. Thanks!

Query: What is the best way to remove the negative? (Again, using
Vantage 9.05.700C) -

Thanks!

Ree

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Deirdre Sykes
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:43 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

No, if you build to stock, the negative is a result of the actual cost
being lower than the cost method of inventory.

Deirdre

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Lori Buck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship
from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job -
this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message,
including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission
to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication or use of the information contained herein is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail
transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying
or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our
address record can be corrected.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What costing method are you using?
This will help answer the question.



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:37 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report





This is a resend. Any help appreciated. Thanks!

Query: What is the best way to remove the negative? (Again, using
Vantage 9.05.700C) -

Thanks!

Ree

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Deirdre Sykes
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:43 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

No, if you build to stock, the negative is a result of the actual cost
being lower than the cost method of inventory.

Deirdre

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Lori Buck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship
from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job -
this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message,
including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission
to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication or use of the information contained herein is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail
transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying
or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our
address record can be corrected.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Cathy: I am told we are using standard costing.



Ree



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Cathy
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 1:54 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report





What costing method are you using?
This will help answer the question.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:37 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

This is a resend. Any help appreciated. Thanks!

Query: What is the best way to remove the negative? (Again, using
Vantage 9.05.700C) -

Thanks!

Ree

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Deirdre Sykes
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:43 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

No, if you build to stock, the negative is a result of the actual cost
being lower than the cost method of inventory.

Deirdre

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Lori Buck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship
from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job -
this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message,
including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission
to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication or use of the information contained herein is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail
transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying
or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our
address record can be corrected.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Pick one the your jobs with the biggest negative and check a few things out
-



There are a lot of reasons your job can be negative - here are some
examples:



1.) Is your standard correct?

2.) Did all the cost get into the job - material, labor, subcontract,
etc?

3.) Did you over receive/ship/ issue more than the Production Qty on the
job?

4.) Did you close the job without the receive/ship/issue transaction -
reopen and then do receive/ship/issue transaction?

5.) If you are using the Quality module did you do a non-conformance and
any material/operation and the material/operation was not returned to the
job?



When I use receive/ship/issue - these are 3 things that will take cost out
of a job (and there might be more like non-conformance). They are:



1.) Job receipt to Inventory

2.) Job receipt to Job

3.) Ship on a Sales order from a job



If you close this job via job closing. Run the Inventory WIP Reconcilation
report. You can narrow this report by filtering by the job.



You might want to choose the option under GL Posting detail to both.



You should see a MFG-VAR transaction. This should post to the Manufacturing
Variance account. It should also bring the WIP job to a 0 balance.











From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 6:08 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report





Cathy: I am told we are using standard costing.

Ree

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Cathy
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 1:54 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

What costing method are you using?
This will help answer the question.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:37 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

This is a resend. Any help appreciated. Thanks!

Query: What is the best way to remove the negative? (Again, using
Vantage 9.05.700C) -

Thanks!

Ree

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Deirdre Sykes
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:43 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

No, if you build to stock, the negative is a result of the actual cost
being lower than the cost method of inventory.

Deirdre

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Lori Buck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

Would this also be the case if you build a job to a Sales Order but ship
from stock?

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report

C.O.S - When you build a job to a Sales Order and ship from that job -
this
number is what came out of WIP and when to the Cost of Sales.

WIP - is the dollars remaining.

If you WIP report is negative then you might have problems with:

1.) Issue material to the job

2.) If you track labor $ are they getting into the job

3.) If you send the job out for value added work - are the subcontract
cost in the job.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:34 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] WIP report

Good afternoon, all!

We are using Vantage 9.05.700C and have the following questions:

On the Work in Process report, what drives the following data:

C.O.S.

WIP

Our WIP report is currently negative and we are trying to locate the
root cause.

Thank you!

Ree

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message,
including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission
to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication or use of the information contained herein is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail
transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying
or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our
address record can be corrected.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thanks for the help, Cathy!



Now for the big question.... How can we clean up a negative WIP on a
job? Is running the Inventory WIP Reconcilation report the best way to
go?



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Close the jobs with the negative WIP.



Run the Inventory WIP Reconciliation report and filter on Specific
Transaction Type - MFG-VAR.



When closing the job, the system should bring the job to Zero.



Not sure what happened or why the jobs are negative but, accounting might
have to Reclass the MFG-VAR cost for these jobs.



The MFG-VAR transaction should to the Manufacturing Variance account and in
the end - it all goes to the Cost of Operations.



Hope this helps.



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Ree Pruehs
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 12:02 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] WIP report





Thanks for the help, Cathy!

Now for the big question.... How can we clean up a negative WIP on a
job? Is running the Inventory WIP Reconcilation report the best way to
go?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]