8.03.409C Testing

I did tests with the GSP on 409c last week and no problem with the boards!!! Did you run the calculate order process before the global scheduling process?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, melissa hietala <kevmel822@...> wrote:
>
> We are currently on 8.03.406, tested 409, and now testing 409C and want to
> upgrade this coming weekend.
>
> Any help on the following 2 issues would be appreciated:
>
> 1. When running global finite scheduling there are jobs that are not appearing
> on the scheduling boards, but are apparently in the system as the Shop Load
> report is showing some machines in an overload situation. If I load level in
> those machines the jobs that were 'invisible' show now on the boards. Did not
> have this problem when we were testing .409
>
> 2. When creating a new Customer Shipment packing list getting an
> Â 'ERROR condition: Parameter number 6 (table ttShipMisc) mismatch. Has 36 fields
> - client schema has 38 fields. (8030)(7211)'
> Any ideas on a db conversion we missed or a fix we need?
>
> I have been through a few more modules without issue and have a few more to go.
> Please let me know if there is anything else I should watch out for, ask Epicor
> for a fix for, or any other pertinent information.
>
> Thanks.
> Melissa Hietala
> UMC, Inc.
> melissah@...
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
We are currently on 8.03.406, tested 409, and now testing 409C and want to
upgrade this coming weekend.

Any help on the following 2 issues would be appreciated:

1. When running global finite scheduling there are jobs that are not appearing
on the scheduling boards, but are apparently in the system as the Shop Load
report is showing some machines in an overload situation. If I load level in
those machines the jobs that were 'invisible' show now on the boards. Did not
have this problem when we were testing .409

2. When creating a new Customer Shipment packing list getting an
 'ERROR condition: Parameter number 6 (table ttShipMisc) mismatch. Has 36 fields
- client schema has 38 fields. (8030)(7211)'
Any ideas on a db conversion we missed or a fix we need?

I have been through a few more modules without issue and have a few more to go.
Please let me know if there is anything else I should watch out for, ask Epicor
for a fix for, or any other pertinent information.

Thanks.
Melissa Hietala
UMC, Inc.
melissah@...




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Melissa, are you using the standard Packing List or a customized one?



I just did a .409C upgrade last weekend and didn't get that error.



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of melissa hietala
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:42 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] 8.03.409C Testing





We are currently on 8.03.406, tested 409, and now testing 409C and want
to
upgrade this coming weekend.

Any help on the following 2 issues would be appreciated:

1. When running global finite scheduling there are jobs that are not
appearing
on the scheduling boards, but are apparently in the system as the Shop
Load
report is showing some machines in an overload situation. If I load
level in
those machines the jobs that were 'invisible' show now on the boards.
Did not
have this problem when we were testing .409

2. When creating a new Customer Shipment packing list getting an
'ERROR condition: Parameter number 6 (table ttShipMisc) mismatch. Has
36 fields
- client schema has 38 fields. (8030)(7211)'
Any ideas on a db conversion we missed or a fix we need?

I have been through a few more modules without issue and have a few more
to go.
Please let me know if there is anything else I should watch out for, ask
Epicor
for a fix for, or any other pertinent information.

Thanks.
Melissa Hietala
UMC, Inc.
melissah@... <mailto:melissah%40ultramc.com>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Standard Customer shipment entry on the Shipping\Receiving menu. But now that
you've asked I will double check and see if we have any customizations I wasn't
aware of. Thanks.

Do you use global scheduling at all?
 Melissa Hietala
UMC, Inc.
melissah@...




________________________________
From: Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, November 22, 2010 10:00:59 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] 8.03.409C Testing

Â
Melissa, are you using the standard Packing List or a customized one?

I just did a .409C upgrade last weekend and didn't get that error.

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of melissa hietala
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:42 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] 8.03.409C Testing

We are currently on 8.03.406, tested 409, and now testing 409C and want
to
upgrade this coming weekend.

Any help on the following 2 issues would be appreciated:

1. When running global finite scheduling there are jobs that are not
appearing
on the scheduling boards, but are apparently in the system as the Shop
Load
report is showing some machines in an overload situation. If I load
level in
those machines the jobs that were 'invisible' show now on the boards.
Did not
have this problem when we were testing .409

2. When creating a new Customer Shipment packing list getting an
'ERROR condition: Parameter number 6 (table ttShipMisc) mismatch. Has
36 fields
- client schema has 38 fields. (8030)(7211)'
Any ideas on a db conversion we missed or a fix we need?

I have been through a few more modules without issue and have a few more
to go.
Please let me know if there is anything else I should watch out for, ask
Epicor
for a fix for, or any other pertinent information.

Thanks.
Melissa Hietala
UMC, Inc.
melissah@... <mailto:melissah%40ultramc.com>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Stan




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sorry.... Can't help you on scheduling....



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of melissa hietala
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 11:18 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.409C Testing





Standard Customer shipment entry on the Shipping\Receiving menu. But
now that
you've asked I will double check and see if we have any customizations I
wasn't
aware of. Thanks.

Do you use global scheduling at all?
Melissa Hietala
UMC, Inc.
melissah@... <mailto:melissah%40ultramc.com>

________________________________
From: Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@...
<mailto:vic.drecchio%40timco.aero> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, November 22, 2010 10:00:59 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] 8.03.409C Testing


Melissa, are you using the standard Packing List or a customized one?

I just did a .409C upgrade last weekend and didn't get that error.

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of melissa hietala
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:42 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] 8.03.409C Testing

We are currently on 8.03.406, tested 409, and now testing 409C and want
to
upgrade this coming weekend.

Any help on the following 2 issues would be appreciated:

1. When running global finite scheduling there are jobs that are not
appearing
on the scheduling boards, but are apparently in the system as the Shop
Load
report is showing some machines in an overload situation. If I load
level in
those machines the jobs that were 'invisible' show now on the boards.
Did not
have this problem when we were testing .409

2. When creating a new Customer Shipment packing list getting an
'ERROR condition: Parameter number 6 (table ttShipMisc) mismatch. Has
36 fields
- client schema has 38 fields. (8030)(7211)'
Any ideas on a db conversion we missed or a fix we need?

I have been through a few more modules without issue and have a few more
to go.
Please let me know if there is anything else I should watch out for, ask
Epicor
for a fix for, or any other pertinent information.

Thanks.
Melissa Hietala
UMC, Inc.
melissah@... <mailto:melissah%40ultramc.com>
<mailto:melissah%40ultramc.com>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Stan

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]