No we are not on 409C yet. Sounds like a bug. When you run the manual scheduling, trying just running backward infinite.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, melissa hietala <kevmel822@...> wrote:
>
> Yes we do schedule right away. The problem seems to be with the process
> backwards scheduling and then needing to 'bounce' to forward scheduling.
> Have you been on 409C long?
>  Melissa Hietala
> UMC, Inc.
> melissah@...
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Monte <monte.tomerlin@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, December 17, 2010 8:32:58 AM
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: .409C Scheduling problem- Looking for some Guru help
>
> ÂÂ
> At the time of Releasing the Job, do you immediately run any form of manual
> scheduling. I ask only because that is my practice and I have never experienced
> your outcome.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, melissa hietala <kevmel822@> wrote:
> >
> > Since upgrading to .409C we ran a global processing schedule and have some
> > issues. Scheduled in Finite and infinite modes both, with same results.
> >
> > 1. We have jobs that are scheduled and show up on priority dispatch and shop
> > loads, but are not visible on scheduling boards until we do a load level
> > process. Then they pop in.
> > 2. Those jobs that pop in, if you look at job change logs, it does not show
> >them
> >
> > being part of the process.
> > 3. Looking at the scheduling logs for those same jobs, the one constant in all
>
> > that noise, is that they all had to 'bounce' becasue they could not schedule
> > backwards and make the date.
> >
> > Thanks
> >  Melissa Hietala
> > UMC, Inc.
> > melissah@
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>