BPM Creating PO Errors On Second Record

Epicor ERP 10
1

Hey there,

I’d appreciate a second pair of eyes or 100. In the code below I’m reading from records in UD09 of selected BTO Drop-Ship order releases, with the intent of creating a purchase order for each site/order num.

At this present early stage, it would create a PO for each order release.

A single record works great–sets up the header record and the detail.

But when I add the second UD09 record, it sets up the first PO okay, creates the second PO header and dies on the update. I’ve tried creating a new tableset, without any evident effect.

I can’t see the issue. Have some fresh eyes you’d care to lend?

Thanks,

Joe

// process POs

Erp.Contracts.POSvcContract poEntry = Ice.Assemblies.ServiceRenderer.GetService<Erp.Contracts.POSvcContract>(this.Db, true);

using(var txscope = IceDataContext.CreateDefaultTransactionScope())        //Start Transaction
{
	foreach(var ttUD09_xRow in (from row in ttUD09
	select row))
	{
		if (Convert.ToDecimal(ttUD09_xRow["NewPOQty_c"]) >0)
		{
			//tried creating new tableset each time
			//dsPO = new Erp.Tablesets.POTableset();

			poEntry.GetNewPOHeader(ref dsPO);

			var poHeader_xRow = (from row in dsPO.POHeader
			where row.RowMod == IceRow.ROWSTATE_ADDED
			select row).FirstOrDefault();

			bool poHeaderUpdated = false;
			
			if (poHeader_xRow != null)
			{
				poHeader_xRow.OpenOrder = true;
				poHeader_xRow.OrderDate = DateTime.Now;
				poHeader_xRow.VendorNum = Convert.ToInt32(ttUD09_xRow["VendorNum_c"]);
				poHeader_xRow.BuyerID = "1000";
				poHeader_xRow.TermsCode = "T100";
				poHeader_xRow.ShipViaCode = "BW";
				poHeader_xRow.ReadyToPrint = true;
				poHeader_xRow.Approve = false;
				poHeader_xRow.POType = "STD";
				
				poHeaderUpdated = true;
			}

			if (poHeaderUpdated)
			{
				//dies right here on the second PO
				poEntry.Update(ref dsPO);
				
				poHeader_xRow = (from row in dsPO.POHeader
				select row).FirstOrDefault();
				
				if (poHeader_xRow != null)
				{
					bool poDetailUpdated = false;

					poEntry.GetNewPODetail(ref dsPO, poHeader_xRow.PONum);
					
					var poDetail_xRow = (from row in dsPO.PODetail
					where row.RowMod == IceRow.ROWSTATE_ADDED
					select row).FirstOrDefault();

					if (poDetail_xRow != null)
					{
						poEntry.ChangeDetailOrderNum(Convert.ToInt32(ttUD09_xRow["OrderNum_c"]), ref dsPO);
						poEntry.ChangeDetailOrderLine(Convert.ToInt32(ttUD09_xRow["OrderLine_c"]), ref dsPO);
						
						poDetailUpdated = true;
					}

					if (poDetailUpdated) poEntry.Update(ref dsPO);
				} 
				
			}

			//ttUD09_xRow.RowMod = "D";
		}
	}

	txscope.Complete();                            //Close Transaction
}
2

try adding
Db.Validate();
txscope.Complete(); //Close Transaction
}

3

Thanks, Arul. I get the same issue. It’s reporting “Object reference not set to an instance of an object” when I hit the update on the second PO record. Even when I create a brand new tableset on each iteration of UD09and all that should be in it is a single, added PO header record.

Joe

4

Update: I moved the poEntry connection inside the for loop (Thanks, Jim Kinneman) and all is well.

Joe