Thank you all for shining some light on this issue!
The moment I replaced "burden hours" with "productive hours"
it was clear to me!
Because we schedule/use persons and machines as separate entities.
"machine hours" were confusing.
It makes sense that persons have more productive hours (burden) than
laborhours depending on their function in a workshop.
The remark "crew size=1" is appliable to our situation and we use
this.
The only thing i had to do is to equal burden to labor and it al
comes together.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "saab_barracuda" <chris.clunn@...>
wrote:
The moment I replaced "burden hours" with "productive hours"
it was clear to me!
Because we schedule/use persons and machines as separate entities.
"machine hours" were confusing.
It makes sense that persons have more productive hours (burden) than
laborhours depending on their function in a workshop.
The remark "crew size=1" is appliable to our situation and we use
this.
The only thing i had to do is to equal burden to labor and it al
comes together.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "saab_barracuda" <chris.clunn@...>
wrote:
>hours
> It's the same with the labor on the Production Detail Report. The
> labor estimates and actuals (from JobOper) are based on burden
> (machine) hours. It makes sense scheduling would look at burden
> instead of labor hours. The focus is on the contrained resourcesthere
> (machines) and the labor is calculated to whatever is required to
> operate those machines.
>
> You need to have a resource setup as the primary operation detail in
> each Operation setup and not just a resource group. It needs the
> resource so that it can calculate the burden (machine) time. If
> is no machine, it won't calculate the actual burden hours properly.to
>
> If I understand your situation correctly, you need the burden hours
> directly correspond with labor hours. Consider checkingthe "burden =
> labor" box and set Crew Size=1 in the Resource Group/Resource setupso
> the burden hours will calculate one for one with labor hours. ThisEstProdHours.
> way your actual burden hours should match up with your
> And since your burden is included in labor rate, set the burden ratespent
> to zero and your costs should come out okay as well.
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "fonsvanderbeek" <fons.vanderbeek@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Vantage 8.03 Progress database
> >
> > We have setup our installation in a way that every hour that is
> > on a project is entered in "laborhours", we don'tuse "burdenhours"
> > and leave this field empty (zero) but now we encounter problemsin
> > the Job scheduling board. It seems that only burdenhours aretaken
> > into account for calculating the remaining hours.based
> >
> > I don't get it: When I look at the Details in "The job scheduling
> > board"
> > on the left there is a field "Est Hours", on the right there is a
> > field "Remaining hours"
> >
> > The Field "Est Hours" contains the total of the estimated hours
> > on LABORHOURShours
> >
> > BUT
> >
> > The Field "Remaining hours" depends on entry based on BURDEN
> > ("Est Hours" minus the total of all burdenhours), but we dont
> > use "Burden Hours"...........
> >
> > The load relieve is based on Hours
> > (company maintenance->company->company configuration->modules ->
> > production -> job -> load relieved by hours)
> >
> > We dont use "labor=burden" setting because it seemed unlogical to
> > fill a database with identical entries. We planned to use "burden
> > hours" for overtime in future
> >
> > My questions are:
> > Do we have to use "Burden Hours"?
> > What is the exact definition and use of "Burden hours"? VS "Labor
> > Hours"?
> > Does a setting exist that is needed for a different calculation
> > of "Remaining Hours"?
> >
>