Customization/BPM for Lot Control Numbering

Yahoo Archive
1
Mark,
   No such luck. I am still on 4.03.408 (Progress)
Thanks,
-Karl




________________________________
From: Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, April 15, 2011 7:37:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Customization/BPM for Lot Control Numbering

Â
Karl, which version are you on? If you go to the Lot tab on the part in E9 you
have the option to assign the next sequential lot number

________________________________
From: Karl Dash <dashkarl@...>
To: Vantage Group <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, April 15, 2011 9:42:00 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Customization/BPM for Lot Control Numbering

Â
Just wondering if anyone has developed a BPM or VB customization that develops
the next sequential number for receipts of lot controlled parts?

Thanks,
-Karl

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Just wondering if anyone has developed a BPM or VB customization that develops
the next sequential number for receipts of lot controlled parts?

Thanks,
-Karl

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
Karl, which version are you on? If you go to the Lot tab on the part in E9 you
have the option to assign the next sequential lot number




________________________________
From: Karl Dash <dashkarl@...>
To: Vantage Group <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, April 15, 2011 9:42:00 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Customization/BPM for Lot Control Numbering

Â
Just wondering if anyone has developed a BPM or VB customization that develops
the next sequential number for receipts of lot controlled parts?

Thanks,
-Karl

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
I just wanted to check with the group on this. We are having a problem with a few jobs when getting details from a method the client just locks up. It doesn’t matter what workstation you are on. Many other jobs “get details fine”.

Epicor support suggested a re-index and then a re-sequence. We did this last night, but it did not correct the issue.

I was wondering if anyone else had seen this problem before or not. It’s happening on a method that has been approved since 2004 and on a part that is new and the method was copied from another similar part and the route/material changed for the new part.

Any insight would be appreciated.

Thanks,


Paul Lipham
Information Technology Manager
Alabama Specialty Products, Inc.
152 Metal Samples Road
Munford, AL 36268




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]