I am glad my checking account doesn't work that way. I voided on last week
and I don't want a zero balance. J
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Julie Lehmann
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:15 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Cycle count
Rob,
Even back in 6.1, voiding the tag zeros out the quantity of the part.
Here's what help says:
Voiding a tag and then posting the count adjusts the on-hand inventory to
zero. This results in subsequent orders not being able to see the stock,
among other things. Make sure that this is really what you want to do.
If we don't have time to count everything, we enter the quantity that
Vantage thinks is there and then keep the list to count those parts the next
day.
We never use "void" after finding that out years ago. I agree with your
logic (it should simply exclude it from being considered), but it doesn't
work that way.
Julie
Mercury Minnesota Inc.
and I don't want a zero balance. J
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Julie Lehmann
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:15 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Cycle count
Rob,
Even back in 6.1, voiding the tag zeros out the quantity of the part.
Here's what help says:
Voiding a tag and then posting the count adjusts the on-hand inventory to
zero. This results in subsequent orders not being able to see the stock,
among other things. Make sure that this is really what you want to do.
If we don't have time to count everything, we enter the quantity that
Vantage thinks is there and then keep the list to count those parts the next
day.
We never use "void" after finding that out years ago. I agree with your
logic (it should simply exclude it from being considered), but it doesn't
work that way.
Julie
Mercury Minnesota Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Brown
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Cycle count
Excuse me but NO (at least thru 405A & every other system I've ever used).
When you void a tag it is a mechanism to EXCLUDE it from the update (and yet
let you be assured all tags are accounted for).
If it's not working like that for you, please tell me what version(s) you
are on so I can avoid them like the plague. (Seriously!)
-------
ABC basis: Help file is pretty good in describing the tiers avaiable,
Min Unit COst for Prt to qualify for A, B or C.
?Last 30 days? - can't remember - Receipt + Issue combined total cost (flow
- In & Out) history tiers.
Best thing to do is do a ?30 day? dump of your part trans records into excel
and summarize the cost flow total over that time (per part).
Then rank by top $'s decending and select the min $ tiers for A B C (using
the old APICS 5/15/80 or 10/20/70 % rules).
Similarly, look at unit costs decending to come up with the secondary unit
cost tier rules for ABC.
Don't get to braod with each or your results will be heavily biased to A and
be 'top heavy'.
Rob
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, gclauser <gclauser@...
<mailto:gclauser%40ameritech.net> > wrote:
From: gclauser <gclauser@... <mailto:gclauser%40ameritech.net> >
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Cycle count
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 8:40 AM
That's the way it's supposed to work. Tags are printed for parts that are
supposed to have a balance. If you void the tag you're telling Vantage that
you could not find the parts.
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Hughes
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Cycle count
Someone posted some formulas to help calculate what you should enter in the
ABC Code setup screen to help you cycle through all your parts in the course
of a year. Does anyone remember? I search the old posts for "cycle count abc
code" and so on, but cannot find it...
Thank you!
____________ _________ _________ __
From: thughes281 <thughes281@yahoo. com>
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:24:23 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Cycle count
When I Void the tag, it unfortunately does just the opposite.
It zeroed the inventory out, posting an ADJ-INV transaction for a negative
of what the countexp
Is this a bug, or the way it is supposed to work?
Did I do it wrong?
I entered the tag in Count Entry, then clicked the Void button to the right
of it.
How do you safely void a tag you don't want to count, or can't count that
day?
Void as in, leaves inventory as it was, and removes the tag from teh count
set so I don't have to enter anything?
--- In vantage@yahoogroups .com, "Charles Carden" <shadowcar1449@ ...>
wrote:
>
> You will have to void all of the other tags to keep those parts from being
set to zero during the posting process. Don't just mark them as returned as
this will indicate a zero count. This would be a tedious process as you must
confirm for every tag you void. Also, once voided, always voided.
>
> Cycle counting was designed to select parts based on the ABC code settings
or to be used for a full inventory count. There is no method to let you
select only the parts you want to count. In fact, if you attempt to select
parts manually you are only able to select one part at a time using the
search function. Also, a paste insert will not work in the list view either.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tony Hughes
> To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 8:54 AM
> Subject: [Vantage] Cycle count
>
>
> What happens if you start a Full Cycle Count, but only ever enter some of
the parts?
>
> Say, I want to do only a subset of my bins, but I don't have the bins set
up as Warehouses. So, I run a Full and only enter values for the bins I
count.
>
> What effect does this have?
>
> Thank you, this is our first Full Cycle count in Vtg 8.x, so hopefully
this question isn't too stupid :-D
>
> TOny
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]