Hi, I am trying to get E9 9.04.506c up and running. One of my issues (I seem to have many these days) is that I am trying to get an understanding with regards to the Purchase Order Receiving process and the flow that has to be performed to reject parts in inspection. In Avante (which we are on now), we can reject the parts, create a Shipper and a negative receiver to return the parts which in turn re-opens the purchase order. Is there a documented flow for this procedure in E9 and also the procedure that AP would have to go thru to make sure they do not pay for inventory that was returned to Supplier? Hopefully this makes some sense. Thanks, Bob JessopIt DirectorMisonix Inc.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RTV in E9 is pretty much a manual thing. It will not do a negative receiver, and will not reopen the PO for the replacement.
  You pretty much do the inspection, fail to DMR, and in the DMR, you request a debit memo (before you disposition). Then, in A/P you do Actions > Get > debit memo, and you can use it to balance a replacement receipt, or the original invoice, if the material is returned (via a misc shipment).
 Hope this helps!
 - leAnn
Â
Â
From: Robert Jessop <rjj@...>
Subject: [Vantage] RE: Epicor9 - Return to Supplier process
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, March 14, 2011, 11:39 AM
Â
Hi, I am trying to get E9 9.04.506c up and running. One of my issues (I seem to have many these days) is that I am trying to get an understanding with regards to the Purchase Order Receiving process and the flow that has to be performed to reject parts in inspection. In Avante (which we are on now), we can reject the parts, create a Shipper and a negative receiver to return the parts which in turn re-opens the purchase order. Is there a documented flow for this procedure in E9 and also the procedure that AP would have to go thru to make sure they do not pay for inventory that was returned to Supplier? Hopefully this makes some sense. Thanks, Bob JessopIt DirectorMisonix Inc.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I just wanted to thank everyone for their input. Unfortunately not the answer we were hoping for. Maybe it is in the works or we will have to put in a formal request.
Thanks again,
Bob Jessop
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]