Interestingly, I received the following email from Epicor this evening.
Dear Customer,
This is a notification that a costing issue reported within the Core Application, If you use backflushing within job costing and are on an earlier version of 10.2 than the versions listed below, please contact support to receive an expedited fix:
10.2.200.34 GA 11/31/19
10.2.400.14 GA 10/25/19
10.2.500.3 GA 10/23/19
You are receiving this notification because our records indicate you are on a prior version of 10.2. If you feel you received this in error, you can update your version information on the portal by going to the Configurations > Product Configuration Profiles menu, or please let us know so we can help correct the version information we have on record.
Description of issue:
Incorrect job costing when backflushed is being used.
This is causing incorrect variance (MFG-VAR) calculations on jobs.
Multiple scenarios were found and corrected
Dollars to Inventory are not correct
Dollars seem to be doubled using the Qty x Cost Components
Dollars remain in WIP since the job is closed
This is also causing Negative Material if depending on the costing components of the part.
Example:
Unit Material:
Unit Labor: (too high amount going to inventory)
Unit Burden: (too high amount going to inventory)
Unit Subcontract: (Not cleared out of WIP)
Unit Material Burden: (Not cleared out of WIP)
EpicCare Customer Support