We chose 64-bit for the same reason - to support more RAM.
Windows Server 2003 32-bit Standard Edition: 4GB maximum
Windows Server 2003 64-bit Standard Edition: 16GB
It should be noted, however, that if you wanted to spend the extra money
and purchase the higher-echelon Windows Server editions, your RAM
maximums could be as high as 128GB. Considering that the 32-bit and
64-bit licenses for the same echelon/edition are interchangeable, it was
more cost-effective for us to use the 64-bit platform.
Here's a link that lists RAM limits for various Windows
editions/platforms:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778(VS.85).aspx
--Ari
________________________________
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Kunal Ganguly
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:07 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 32-bit vs 64-bit OS for server
Our IT dept chose 64 bit because it was recommended that we use 16GB of
memory for the vantage server.
Thanks,
Kunal
----- Original Message ----
From: Manasa Reddy <
manasa@... <mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com> >
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:56:42 AM
Subject: [Vantage] 32-bit vs 64-bit OS for server
Would anyone like to share the advantages and disadvantages of having
this on their server for Vista/Vantage?
Or is there any real significance for the database in question?
TIA!
M. Manasa Reddy
ERP / Inventory & Procurement Manager
Welding Company of America
manasa@weldcoa. com
P: 630-806-2000
F: 630-806-2001
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]