Thank you. Now, if we can just get another 100 users to do so...
Btw, DataFlo users can do this (hint, hint)...
Regards,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Manasa Reddy [mailto:mmreddy@...]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:21 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] [6.1] Inspection required field in part table
Definitely agree with you there, we had the same issue.
Well I go sign up for the enhancement now....
M. Manasa Reddy
ERP Specialist
Crestview Aerospace Corporation
Email: mmreddy@...
Phone: (850) 682-2746 x 272
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Lepley, Scott
A.
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:12 AM
To: 'vantage@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [Vantage] [6.1] Inspection required field in
part table
Yep, sure did. Unfortunately, for us to use that feature
effectively for
quality control purposes, we would need to split some of
our existing part
classes (e.g. video components) into two separate part
classes (e.g. video
components - inspection required and video components -
inspection NOT
required). Seems somewhat contradictory to the concept of
material
classification...
Regards,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Manasa Reddy
[mailto:mmreddy@...]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:57 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] [6.1] Inspection required field in
part table
Although I can see why you would want it on the part
itself
and I will put my name on the list for the enhancement,
did
you know you can do it on the part class?
M. Manasa Reddy
ERP Specialist
Crestview Aerospace Corporation
Email: mmreddy@...
Phone: (850) 682-2746 x 272
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Lepley, Scott
A.
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:48 AM
To: 'vantage@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: [Vantage] [6.1] Inspection required field in
part table
Hello group,
An enhancement request is currently open with Epicor
that
asks that an
"inspection required" field be added to the part table.
I
would like to ask
everyone interested in this enhancement to contact
Epicor
to show support
for it. You can reference call #1516051MPS (opened
today), page #3876MPS
(enhancement request opened 06/2000) or page #6954MPS
(enhancement request
opened 01/2002).
Regards,
Scott Lepley
Systems Administrator
Mauell Corporation
Phone: 717-432-8686, ext. 14
Fax: 717-432-8688
Email: sal@...
Vantage version: 6.10.531
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Btw, DataFlo users can do this (hint, hint)...
Regards,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Manasa Reddy [mailto:mmreddy@...]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:21 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] [6.1] Inspection required field in part table
Definitely agree with you there, we had the same issue.
Well I go sign up for the enhancement now....
M. Manasa Reddy
ERP Specialist
Crestview Aerospace Corporation
Email: mmreddy@...
Phone: (850) 682-2746 x 272
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Lepley, Scott
A.
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:12 AM
To: 'vantage@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [Vantage] [6.1] Inspection required field in
part table
Yep, sure did. Unfortunately, for us to use that feature
effectively for
quality control purposes, we would need to split some of
our existing part
classes (e.g. video components) into two separate part
classes (e.g. video
components - inspection required and video components -
inspection NOT
required). Seems somewhat contradictory to the concept of
material
classification...
Regards,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Manasa Reddy
[mailto:mmreddy@...]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:57 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] [6.1] Inspection required field in
part table
Although I can see why you would want it on the part
itself
and I will put my name on the list for the enhancement,
did
you know you can do it on the part class?
M. Manasa Reddy
ERP Specialist
Crestview Aerospace Corporation
Email: mmreddy@...
Phone: (850) 682-2746 x 272
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Lepley, Scott
A.
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:48 AM
To: 'vantage@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: [Vantage] [6.1] Inspection required field in
part table
Hello group,
An enhancement request is currently open with Epicor
that
asks that an
"inspection required" field be added to the part table.
I
would like to ask
everyone interested in this enhancement to contact
Epicor
to show support
for it. You can reference call #1516051MPS (opened
today), page #3876MPS
(enhancement request opened 06/2000) or page #6954MPS
(enhancement request
opened 01/2002).
Regards,
Scott Lepley
Systems Administrator
Mauell Corporation
Phone: 717-432-8686, ext. 14
Fax: 717-432-8688
Email: sal@...
Vantage version: 6.10.531
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]