We have a very similar setup & versions to the message below, and get similar numbers (.20 & .41) from the performance monitoring tool.
Internally, we measure the average server processing time of our 10 top reports, comparing month-to-month for a heads up of performance changes. Easier than trying to measure an interactive process. But unfortunately not comparable between companies, because of the different reporting requirements.
Brian.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mordechai
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:33 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor Performance
We have been using Epicor on VMware for the past 5 1/2 year, now running 905.604 in production and testing 905.700
Windows 2008r2 on SQL 2008
Would be happy to share experience, not sure how best to compare performance short on Epicor's new performance diagnostic tools measuring server and network
We usually run server at .18 sec and network at .40
Servers are split, SQL, main app server and a separate print server
Let me know if you need more help
Motty
Internally, we measure the average server processing time of our 10 top reports, comparing month-to-month for a heads up of performance changes. Easier than trying to measure an interactive process. But unfortunately not comparable between companies, because of the different reporting requirements.
Brian.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mordechai
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:33 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor Performance
We have been using Epicor on VMware for the past 5 1/2 year, now running 905.604 in production and testing 905.700
Windows 2008r2 on SQL 2008
Would be happy to share experience, not sure how best to compare performance short on Epicor's new performance diagnostic tools measuring server and network
We usually run server at .18 sec and network at .40
Servers are split, SQL, main app server and a separate print server
Let me know if you need more help
Motty
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , "too_much_hg" <neil_willet@...> wrote:
>
> What version of VMware are you running ?
>
> Are you using a different VM for the SQL backend ?
>
> Are the VM's both on the same host or different hosts ?
>
> Have you checked your VM performance with iometer ?
>
> Neil
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@> wrote:
> >
> > Jason, I can't offer a lot on this other than I had a client a few years ago running VMWare and it turned out there were some specific hardware settings that were severly affecting performance when running VM. They were on HP hardware. I will look to see if I can find some more specific notes but I know that after some hardware setting changes performance improved dramatically
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: "Doyle, Jason" <jdoyle@>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:18 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Vantage] Epicor Performance
> >
> >
> > Â
> > 9.05.700B
> >
> > SQL
> >
> > Jason Doyle
> >
> > Software Architect
> >
> > Cranel, Inc.
> >
> > Cranel Imaging / ISOdx / Versitec
> >
> > 8999 Gemini Parkway / Columbus, OH 43240
> >
> > p: 614.318.4256 / f: 614.431.8388
> >
> > email: mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com <mailto:mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com>
> >
> > cranelimaging.com <http://www.cranelimaging.com/> / isodxsolutions.com
> > <http://www.isodxsolutions.com/> / versitec.com
> > <http://www.versitec.com/>
> >
> > 1985-2010...Celebrating 25 years of excellence, 25 years of evolution
> >
> > From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of Bethany Rye
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:17 PM
> > To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [Vantage] Epicor Performance
> >
> > Can you give the us what version of Epicor you are on as well as what
> > kind
> > of database (Progress or SQL)?
> >
> > Beth Rye
> >
> > IT Director
> >
> > CIGNYS
> > Email: <mailto:mailto:brye%40cignys.com <mailto:brye%40cignys.com <mailto:mailto:brye%40cignys.com%20%3cmailto:brye%40cignys.com> > >
> > mailto:brye%40cignys.com <mailto:brye%40cignys.com>
> >
> > ***ITAR NOTICE***
> >
> > This e-mail and/or the attached documents may contain technical data
> > within
> > the definition of the International Traffic in Arms regulations, and are
> > subject to the export control laws of the US Government. Transfer of
> > this
> > data by any means to a foreign person, whether in the US or abroad,
> > without
> > an export license or other approval from the US Department of State, is
> > prohibited. No portion of this e-mail or its attachment(s) may be
> > reproduced
> > without written consent of CIGNYS. If you are not the intended recipient
> > or
> > believe that you may have received this document in error, please notify
> > the
> > sender and delete this e-mail and any attachments immediately.
> >
> > From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> > Behalf Of
> > Doyle, Jason
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:12 PM
> > To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Epicor Performance
> >
> > Just curious if anyone out there is setup in a VMWare environment with
> > Epicor, and what your performance looks like. We are struggling through
> > some serious performance issues around BAQs, and have spent numerous
> > hours with Epicor, with no resolution in sight. We have had VMWare
> > experts look at our setup, and they can see no issues, but Epicor keeps
> > pushing back that it's our infrastructure.
> >
> > What kind performance times are you getting with even simple BAQs?
> >
> > Would anyone be willing to swap notes and query times? We just want to
> > verify if it is what it is, and need to look to other alternatives to
> > increase performance, or if we are experiencing abnormal performance.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Jason Doyle
> >
> > Software Architect
> >
> > Cranel, Inc.
> >
> > Cranel Imaging / ISOdx / Versitec
> >
> > 8999 Gemini Parkway / Columbus, OH 43240
> >
> > p: 614.318.4256 / f: 614.431.8388
> >
> > email: mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com <mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com>
> > <mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com>
> > <mailto:mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com <mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com <mailto:mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com%20%3cmailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com> >
> > <mailto:jdoyle%40cranel.com> >
> >
> > cranelimaging.com <http://www.cranelimaging.com/> / isodxsolutions.com
> > <http://www.isodxsolutions.com/> / versitec.com
> > <http://www.versitec.com/>
> >
> > 1985-2010...Celebrating 25 years of excellence, 25 years of evolution
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments
> > may
> > contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the
> > designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended
> > recipient,
> > you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
> > error
> > and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying
> > of
> > it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this
> > communication in
> > error; please notify Cranel Incorporated immediately by telephone at
> > 614-431-8000 or 800-288-3475 and destroy all copies of this
> > communication
> > and any attachments.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]