Job change question

Charlie



Store in Finished WIP



You can either link all four releases into the your job, which would be
for 2000 (4 x 500). If you make more than the first release for 500,
you can store them as finished WIP against your job number and ship them
each release at a time from that same job



Or



Stores in Inventory



You can link the first release into the job and add a job demand for
1500 for stock, so your job is still for 2000 (1 x 500, 1 x 1500) and
override the last three releases and allocate them to stock

Receive the 1500 to stock off the job as you make them and pick them
from the inventory shelf as you need to ship them



Gary



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Charlie Wilson
Sent: 01 August 2008 20:52
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Cc: 'Jennifer Roberts'; ccarmack@...
Subject: [Vantage] Job change question.



Hello,

We have a situation were we have released a job to the floor for
production
for an initial quantity of 2000 parts the customer then stated they only
wanted 500 parts on this current release and that they want the
remainder of
the parts in three more releases at different dates. To make all the
cost
and materials come out right when have to reflect it against the
original
job. When in fact only 500 should be reflected on the initial job and
the
remainder 1500 should be spread across three other releases.

If this is confusing please let me know I'm relaying this question on
behalf
of some of our users and I may not have gotten some of the terminology
correct.

Has any one else been in this situation and tell me what they did to
show
this change and correct the issue?

~Charlie

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hello,



We have a situation were we have released a job to the floor for production
for an initial quantity of 2000 parts the customer then stated they only
wanted 500 parts on this current release and that they want the remainder of
the parts in three more releases at different dates. To make all the cost
and materials come out right when have to reflect it against the original
job. When in fact only 500 should be reflected on the initial job and the
remainder 1500 should be spread across three other releases.



If this is confusing please let me know I'm relaying this question on behalf
of some of our users and I may not have gotten some of the terminology
correct.



Has any one else been in this situation and tell me what they did to show
this change and correct the issue?





~Charlie



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Jobs do not have releases like a Sales Order or Purchase Order can.

The question is are you producing all 2000 parts now or are you going to
produce the them as needed per the releases that should be set up on the
Sales Order. The Sales Order should control the Date and Amount of the
Releases.

If you are producing all 2000 now then ship the first 500 on the first
release of the Order. Then what you could do is Receive the Part into
Inventory and then unmark Make Direct on the other releases and pull them
from Inventory.

If you are producing 500 at a time then you will create the number of a Jobs
you need and tie it them to each release of the Sales Order.

Then each Order Release will ship from those jobs.

Hope this make sense.

Scott Litzau, MCP
Olympus Flag & Banner
Information Systems Manager
scott.litzau@...
P: 414-365-9732
F: 414-355-1931


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Charlie Wilson
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 2:52 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Cc: 'Jennifer Roberts'; ccarmack@...
Subject: [Vantage] Job change question.

Hello,



We have a situation were we have released a job to the floor for production
for an initial quantity of 2000 parts the customer then stated they only
wanted 500 parts on this current release and that they want the remainder of
the parts in three more releases at different dates. To make all the cost
and materials come out right when have to reflect it against the original
job. When in fact only 500 should be reflected on the initial job and the
remainder 1500 should be spread across three other releases.



If this is confusing please let me know I'm relaying this question on behalf
of some of our users and I may not have gotten some of the terminology
correct.



Has any one else been in this situation and tell me what they did to show
this change and correct the issue?





~Charlie



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
From Job manager, Split the job (in you case - twice) and it should save you some time. The help file describes the process better than I can in an email.

--- On Fri, 8/1/08, Charlie Wilson <foamdesigncsw@...> wrote:

From: Charlie Wilson <foamdesigncsw@...>
Subject: [Vantage] Job change question.
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Cc: "'Jennifer Roberts'" <jroberts@...>, ccarmack@...
Date: Friday, August 1, 2008, 3:51 PM






Hello,

We have a situation were we have released a job to the floor for production
for an initial quantity of 2000 parts the customer then stated they only
wanted 500 parts on this current release and that they want the remainder of
the parts in three more releases at different dates. To make all the cost
and materials come out right when have to reflect it against the original
job. When in fact only 500 should be reflected on the initial job and the
remainder 1500 should be spread across three other releases.

If this is confusing please let me know I'm relaying this question on behalf
of some of our users and I may not have gotten some of the terminology
correct.

Has any one else been in this situation and tell me what they did to show
this change and correct the issue?

~Charlie

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]