Problem: Checkbox select/deselect in record of PODetail table tr

robertb_versa@...



The specific field is PODetail.RcvInspectionReq; it's an Inspection checkbox
under Purchase Order Entry>Lines>Detail Tab.

I want a deselect / select of PODetail.RcvInspectionReq to deselect /
select same Part Number record in table.field: Part.Checkbox01 (a created
check box). I know I will have to include an adapter to perform this in dot
net. I am hoping to revise code and avoid reinventing the wheel if someone
has already designed something similar to my request.



We are presently Live on Epicor Vantage 8.03.407



Best Regards,



Herby Dallard

Information Technology Engineer

Endicott Research Group

hdallard@...

607-754-9187 ext. 3078

www.ergpower.com







_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
robertb_versa@...
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:59 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Problem: Checkbox select/deselect in record of
PODetail table triggers checkbox select/des





What specific PO entry dataview boolean fields are you tring to set (&/or
what checkbox controls)?

Also - What version are you on?

PO entry is (one of many) 'works in process' as successive versions have
gone thru significant changes.

Rob

--- Original Message ---
From:"Herby Dallard" <hdallard@ergpower. <mailto:hdallard%40ergpower.com>
com>
Sent:Tue 9/15/09 4:39 pm
To:<vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com>
Subj:[Vantage] Problem: Checkbox select/deselect in record of PODetail table
triggers checkbox select/des

All..I need a dot net code that can behave as outlined in subject. Anyone
who had to perform a similar task and may have used dot net or BPM or
anything please reply ASAC.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Herby Dallard

Information Technology Engineer

Endicott Research Group

hdallard@ergpower. <mailto:hdallard%40ergpower.com> com

607-754-9187 ext. 3078

www.ergpower.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]